Anthony Joshua Reveals How A Fight With Mike Tyson Would Go

[Boxing Goat]

I was waiting for a comment on the way I typed or maybe a spelling mistake. This always happens when someone is losing an argument. What I'm waiting for is an explanation of Wlad Sanders and Wlad Brewster. And why the theory of the superheavy edge over the 225ers didn't work.

I have that answers:

1) Sanders was 7 inches taller than Tyson, with a way longer reach, was heavier and he was a southpaw.

2) Brewster got manhandled pillar to post until Wladimir gassed out, which he had only done one other time in his 70 plus fight career.

Next.

[bluepete]

Tyson was in shape. That's a load of crap. He weighed almost exactly the same as he did when he won the title and looked the exact same and was at a prime age, so don't give me that bullsh@t.

And he fought just how he always had. It simply didn't work.

Now I'm convinced you didn't watch the fight if you say he didn't do what he always did. Tyson was just a one trick pony, which is why he got exposed. It was always going to happen. He wouldn't have made in the post Lennox era for any stretch.

Joshua was just being respectful to a legend. Nothing more.

One trick pony. You don't know nothing about boxing. Watch Tyson out jab Tucker. Watch every documentary of the fight and Tyson training habits. Watch the interview were Rooney said he could see Tyson wasn't in shape just by looking at the guy who was once he's fighter. He wouldn't have made it in post Lewis era? You mean the Wlad era? Tyson couldn't have beat Wlad? The guy who was flattened by Sanders and Brewster. Be serious.

[bluepete]

It made you shore up your punctuation didn't it? I call that a Juggernaut win

Really? He said I wasnt using paragraphs actually. Did I start using paragraphs afterwards? Nope. Sounds like your making stuff up.

[bluepete]

I have that answers:

1) Sanders was 7 inches taller than Tyson, with a way longer reach, was heavier and he was a southpaw.

2) Brewster got manhandled pillar to post until Wladimir gassed out, which he had only done one other time in his 70 plus fight career.

Next.

Sanders weighed 225 . I thought weight was the advantage . Ahh so it's height now. Oh that's ok, Tyson spent he's whole career fighting taller men an landing on them. Think Sanders hit harder than Tyson. Ah so it's coz he was southpaw. Brewster wasn't though was he? Brewster was never a guy of Tyson calibre. He wasn't tall like Sanders. Not a southpaw. Still done for Wlad. Ahh Wlad was gassed. Yeah, that's what happens when you fight at a pace you can't handle. He got outlasted and beaten. Tyson wouldve done it even better, because he moved he's head better, was quicker and a better boxer.

[juggernaut666]

Look up Lewis Murphy on YouTube. Then tell me Lewis was under 225 again. And I know he weighed 240 for Briggs. I said he was light when he fought Biggs. And Mason. And Williams. And Weaver. And Ruddock. You know, when he didn't have a good enough punch.

16 stone is under 225 THATS WHAT HE WEIGHED IN AT ,you dont even know your own metric system ? lol

Thats what YOU claimed that Lewis was LIGHTER before Ruddock which is false ,he GAINED weight progressively . He was 227 /228 for Ruddock ?

[mlac]

lol juggernaut in every AJ thread like the cuck he is, telling everyone how he's the GOAT

[juggernaut666]

Sanders weighed 225 . I thought weight was the advantage . Ahh so it's height now. Oh that's ok, Tyson spent he's whole career fighting taller men an landing on them. Think Sanders hit harder than Tyson. Ah so it's coz he was southpaw. Brewster wasn't though was he? Brewster was never a guy of Tyson calibre. He wasn't tall like Sanders. Not a southpaw. Still done for Wlad. Ahh Wlad was gassed. Yeah, that's what happens when you fight at a pace you can't handle. He got outlasted and beaten. Tyson wouldve done it even better, because he moved he's head better, was quicker and a better boxer.

Says the guy who claims Tyson wasnt in his prime without Rooney so now you use a young Stewardless Wlad to try and sound logical when Wlad peaked later on ?You really are turning into a mental midget here ...at least your posts have become shortened ,i dont gave to skip every other one !

[bluepete]

16 stone is under 225 THATS WHAT HE WEIGHED IN AT ,you dont even know your own metric system ? lol

Thats what YOU claimed that Lewis was LIGHTER before Ruddock which is false ,he GAINED weight progressively . He was 227 /228 for Ruddock ?

He weighed 16 stone 6lb.I just listened to it out of Reg Gutteridges mouth on the video. That's 230lb for Murphy. He was 227 for Ruddock. Why can't you understand this verified fact. The point is Btw, that the pre Ruddock time he's weight was mostly in the 220s.When he knocked out all the names I mentioned. He gained weight later in he's career, after Ruddock. But he punched just as hard before as he did after. How much harder do you need to punch than knocking Ruddock out in two? Than stopping 18 out of 21? Your the one who said he wasn't a big puncher early on. Results say otherwise. Why did 225lbders do so well against Wlad again?

[bluepete]

Says the guy who claims Tyson wasnt in his prime without Rooney so now you use a young Stewardless Wlad to try and sound logical when Wlad peaked later on ?You really are turning into a mental midget here ...at least your posts have become shortened ,i dont gave to skip every other one !

Lol moving goalpost. I didn't say Wlad wasn't better under defensive expert Steward. I said being 240 plus didn't help him one iota against 225lbders Sanders and Brewster. How come. According to you the extra 20lb odd gives you all sorts of edge over 225lbders.The little guys just fall in three. How come it didnt help? Brewster and Sanders didnt have Steward either.

[bluepete]

lol juggernaut in every AJ thread like the cuck he is, telling everyone how he's the GOAT

Yeah I know it's him. I just like the fact that I've got him smashing up he's bedroom lol.