Slowly the Truth Comes Out - Horn Won the Fight

[Code Red]

The fight is the same robbery it was the day it happened. It will be the same robbery 100 years from now to anybody who knows how to score a fight and watches a film of the fight. I thought Pacquiao won the fight about 116 to 111 being generous to Horn. Horn won 4 rounds max and the other rounds were clearly Pacquiao rounds because he landed twice as many punches and his punches were cleaner and harder than Horn's punches. I gave Pac a two point round for almost KOing Horn in the 9th round. The referee let Horn fight incredibly dirty without warning him and docking him points if he continued to foul Pacquiao. Pacquiao looked worse than he ever has before but he still deserved to win that fight by many points. If Horn ever fights a top welterweight on neutral ground with a referee who will enforce the rules and 3 good judges who weren't bribed he will lose.

It was Pacs job to be the professional in that fight, the fact manny allowed it to become a slopfest is why he loss. You want to know who a slopfest benefits, Jeff Horn! PAC fought his fight and when you fight your opponents fight in his hometown you lose!

[mathed]

The old man robbed Pac because he didn't resign with TR. Horn cheated like he was CoWARD's stepson and still was out punched by 100 shots and his battered, bruised face was a testament to the ass-whooping PAC handed him. Another example of this corrupt ass sport.

[Madison Boxing]

people on here cant score fights, simple as that. say it after a lot of fights on here, some of the scorecards and assessments are completely bizzarre. Usually seem to go with the opposite of what general opinion is as to who wins, maybe thats what happens on here, the hipsters/elitists think, you know what we are so knowledgable we see things that the general public dont. Every 'casual fan' i know thought it was daylight robbery, compubox isnt 100 percent accurate but it had pacquaio landing DOUBLE the amount of punches and horn landing 12 percent or something lol, but horn won? Really? The old classic 'compubox isnt always right' comes out. Its right when it actually mimics what goes on in the ring, and one fighter was landing and the other one wasnt. Do some of you actually watch these things with your eyes open? As dibella and lewis said its unfathomable how anyone could score it for horn. Ringmagazine said it was laughable, espn had it 117-111 pacquiao. People who scored it for horn either had an agenda at play or dont know anything about scoring a fight. Sorry if that offends some of the posters i like on here but thats the truth, you dont know what youre watching. Was crystal clear who was landing the better shots. Marching forward and mauling someone without landing doesnt equate to point scoring in my book.

[jmrf4435]

Teddy atlas and stephen A are crack heads. This fight was competitive, and pacman was always on the bACK FOOT

[jmrf4435]

people on here cant score fights, simple as that. say it after a lot of fights on here, some of the scorecards and assessments are completely bizzarre. Usually seem to go with the opposite of what general opinion is as to who wins, maybe thats what happens on here, the hipsters/elitists think, you know what we are so knowledgable we see things that the general public dont. Every 'casual fan' i know thought it was daylight robbery, compubox isnt 100 percent accurate but it had pacquaio landing DOUBLE the amount of punches and horn landing 12 percent or something lol, but horn won? Really? The old classic 'compubox isnt always right' comes out. Its right when it actually mimics what goes on in the ring, and one fighter was landing and the other one wasnt. Do some of you actually watch these things with your eyes open? As dibella and lewis said its unfathomable how anyone could score it for horn. Ringmagazine said it was laughable, espn had it 117-111 pacquiao. People who scored it for horn either had an agenda at play or dont know anything about scoring a fight. Sorry if that offends some of the posters i like on here but thats the truth, you dont know what youre watching. Was crystal clear who was landing the better shots. Marching forward and mauling someone without landing doesnt equate to point scoring in my book.

It's scored round by round, and there were competitive rounds. Those punch stats are suspect...ESPN is a **** network. Stop over weighting compubox, it's misleading.

[kingstip9]

I scored it 115-113 for Horn.

I've always said that fans should not score their idol's fights because it blinds them somehow.

One must be neutral when scoring a fight

Thats a very fair point. Green k

[Code Red]

It's scored round by round, and there were competitive rounds. Those punch stats are suspect...ESPN is a **** network. Stop over weighting compubox, it's misleading.

Real boxing fans know that compubox is never and will never be a record of proof that somebody was robbed or got a gift. Round by round ebb and flow, ring generalship, and who is the boss, the dictator, the alpha in the fight is a much more meaningful source.

[rickJen]

Bandwagoners who usually root against whyties.
Just shows they hate Pac more than Bobfather and whyty fighters.
They can't get past the Pac/May comparison.

[Code Red]

people on here cant score fights, simple as that. say it after a lot of fights on here, some of the scorecards and assessments are completely bizzarre. Usually seem to go with the opposite of what general opinion is as to who wins, maybe thats what happens on here, the hipsters/elitists think, you know what we are so knowledgable we see things that the general public dont. Every 'casual fan' i know thought it was daylight robbery, compubox isnt 100 percent accurate but it had pacquaio landing DOUBLE the amount of punches and horn landing 12 percent or something lol, but horn won? Really? The old classic 'compubox isnt always right' comes out. Its right when it actually mimics what goes on in the ring, and one fighter was landing and the other one wasnt. Do some of you actually watch these things with your eyes open? As dibella and lewis said its unfathomable how anyone could score it for horn. Ringmagazine said it was laughable, espn had it 117-111 pacquiao. People who scored it for horn either had an agenda at play or dont know anything about scoring a fight. Sorry if that offends some of the posters i like on here but thats the truth, you dont know what youre watching. Was crystal clear who was landing the better shots. Marching forward and mauling someone without landing doesnt equate to point scoring in my book.

You are going to have to use paragraphs and punctuation, cant read this

[Robbie Barrett]

People are starting to see past the ESPN bias.

Manny Pacquiao robbed again!! Good, grief, boxing

— Mike Coppinger (@MikeCoppinger) 2 July 2017

I found only one round Pacquiao definitively won: the ninth, which I scored 10-8 for Pacman ...

— Mike Coppinger (@MikeCoppinger) 5 July 2017