Originally posted by Motorcity Cobra
View Post
I feel this is kind of the case with this fight. Outside of the 9th round, I don't think Pac landed many punches that hurt Horn, but others disagree. Sometimes Pac would get hit and bang his gloves together to showboat and people interpret that differently too. For some people it shows that Horn's punches weren't bothering Pac. For others it's a sign that Pac was stung and trying to cover it up by showboating. It all comes down to our own flawed interpretations of what punches are effective.
The only real way to take away all controversy, is to not rely on our judgement at all. Put sensors on the fighters that track every single punch landed, and track how powerful they were. But now that I think about it, even if the technology was perfect, there would still be debate. Why? Because you could have fights where fighter A punches hard but has a weak chin, and fighter B has an iron chin but doesn't punch as hard. Fighter A might be punching fighter B hard but having no effect. Fighter B despite being a weaker puncher, is still hurting fighter A because fighter A has a weak chin.
So the moral of the story is that there is no solution. People just have to live with the fact that there is no completely objective way to score boxing, and as such people will always have different opinions on who won.
Comment