horn v pacquiao wasnt close...

[Damn Wicked]

I'm just not seeing these extra 90 punches for PAC, I though that he got outlander in many of the rounds and basically fought in cruise control. He was missing way more of his left hands than he should have too

I agree. Pac was missing more punches tonight than I've ever seen him miss. He was beat fairly.

[A.K]

Insight? What's the point in that. How can I compete with ESPN.

Learn to watch the fight.

I was scoring live in the round by round and had it 7-5 Horn.

I made a thread after round 5 saying Pacquiao was going to lose.

I saw what you didn't. You were influenced by ESPN because you're a gullible ******.

Well I rest my case you're a troll gone wrong

[Robbie Barrett]

Well I rest my case you're a troll gone wrong

You have no case some people can see what's happening in a fight, lots can't. You're in the CAN'T category. All us that can enjoy laughing at you can'ts.

[Ray*]

I thought Pac won but I can see how Horn got the nod from the judges, Boxnation scored it to Horn too.

[Madison Boxing]

http://www.espn.co.uk/sportsnation/s...eff-horn-fight

swear this forum exists in a different dimension, usually says the opposite of most general opinion. Today ive had two mates who watched message me 'boxing is a joke' and one saying he gave pacquiao 8 rounds. dont mean to be an arse but do you guys actually know what you are watching? seems to be bizarre reactions to most fights on here.

[KillerRightHook]

http://www.espn.co.uk/sportsnation/s...eff-horn-fight

swear this forum exists in a different dimension, usually says the opposite of most general opinion. Today ive had two mates who watched message me 'boxing is a joke' and one saying he gave pacquiao 8 rounds. dont mean to be an arse but do you guys actually know what you are watching? seems to be bizarre reactions to most fights on here.

I scored it 116-113 to Pacquiao with the commentary muted. Pacquiao made Horn look sloppy for the majority of the fight with his slipping and counter punching. I liked Horn's aggression but he was hitting gloves and air, especially in the second half of the fight. However, his inside work was definitely sharper than Pacquiao's. Pacquiao wasn't cutting off the ring very well, especially in the 9th when he had Horn hurt.

All things considered, I can't see how you could give Horn the fight. When the champion lands more than you in almost every round, and is superior in categories such as defence and counter punching, it's hard to make a case for you winning. Just my two cents on this controversy.

[Kosta]

Agree. Had it 117-12 to Pacman

[Jewish-Reptile]

So every time a close fight goes against your pick its a robbery right ? Can't you just accept you were wrong ? Once again.

[DeadLikeMe]

It's funny how the "white supremacist" movement on boxing websites came to a screeching halt when it came to Pacquiao going life or death with Jeff Hornacek.

[Kosta]

I really don't know how anyone has this as close. I can't see anyway horn wins by UD.

Interestingly I switched channels as one stream was bad around round 7. I switched from some American coverage which had pax 5 rounds up. Switched to some uk coverage which had horn up by 3! I mean if that doesn't prove how subjective this scoring is I don't know what does. For the record, the us coverage was pretty unbiased but the uk coverage had some rocky fan boys rooting for the underdog massively from the get go. Quite clearly it shows u view the fight a different way depending on what u want to happen but I believe most unbiased pundits had pax well ahead