Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why no public backlash of GGG saying Canelo might be his last fight?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Totally wrong analysis. Mayweather retiring to duck a rematch is shameful. Ward ruminating about the same thing (and it was really just a negotiation tactic) is questionable.

    Golovkin saying that if he wins, and Canelo doesn't want a rematch (which is what he actually said that people like to misquote) that wouldn't be avoiding anybody.

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by Chollo Vista View Post
      Are you talking about the same punch stats that said ward didnt land a punch in round 2 of the 1st fight against Kovalev?

      Are you talking about the same punch stats that said Ward only landed 4 punches in rounds 7 of the rematch against kovalev?

      Are you talking about the same punch stats that said Ward only landed 10 body shots in round 8 of the rematch?

      These are the punch stats you rely so faithfully on?

      I was at the fcuking fight and I'm telling you right now, Compubox was heavily flawed for Jacobs vs GGG... I was looking at the amount of jabs they said Jacobs landed and remember thinking HBO must think we're ******ed.

      If you believe the Jacobs vs GG Compubox stats, maybe you really are ******ed
      Ok you don't like punch stats, who got the only knockdown?

      How man rounds was Jacobs hurt in, 4, 5, 8, 9. In 8 and 9 uppercuts had Jacobs dancing. Can you find me any round where Golovkin was hurt? Hell Kell Brook came closer to hurting him.

      Who's face was swelling at the end of the fight? Golovkin's face was way cleaner than Jacobs. Again, Brook did more damage in 5 rounds than Jacobs did in 12.

      But Jacobs won because he fell on his ass and yelled like a WWE wrestler. Give me a break.

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by Deletrious View Post
        Ok you don't like punch stats, who got the only knockdown?

        How man rounds was Jacobs hurt in, 4, 5, 8, 9. In 8 and 9 uppercuts had Jacobs dancing. Can you find me any round where Golovkin was hurt? Hell Kell Brook came closer to hurting him.

        Who's face was swelling at the end of the fight? Golovkin's face was way cleaner than Jacobs. Again, Brook did more damage in 5 rounds than Jacobs did in 12.

        But Jacobs won because he fell on his ass and yelled like a WWE wrestler. Give me a break.
        Jacobs won because not only did he dominate the 2nd half of the fight, but because he won the first 3 rounds.

        YDKSAB

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by Deletrious View Post
          Totally wrong analysis. Mayweather retiring to duck a rematch is shameful. Ward ruminating about the same thing (and it was really just a negotiation tactic) is questionable.

          Golovkin saying that if he wins, and Canelo doesn't want a rematch (which is what he actually said that people like to misquote) that wouldn't be avoiding anybody.
          1. It's ducking Jacobs

          2. There are plenty of fights for him from 160-175

          You idiots use to use these same tactics on Mayweather. Whatever Tyrone did to you guys, I'm sorry

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by !WAR CHAVEZ! View Post
            well ward was talking retirement as a way to not do the rematch with kovalev

            mayweather talked retirement which many percieved as a way to duck margarito

            after canelo ggg would have fought everyone so who cares if he retires.
            Why would Ward not want to rematch a guy he already had the beating of for 6m plus ? You make zero sense.

            Comment


            • #26
              for the life of me I cannot understand how one can actually think Floyd ducked margarita, very interesting logic

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by Chollo Vista View Post
                Jacobs won because not only did he dominate the 2nd half of the fight, but because he won the first 3 rounds.

                YDKSAB
                Lol

                By the 4 criteria used to score rounds, what exactly was Danny dominating?

                1.Clean effective punches. Nope. Not only did GGG land more, his punches were obviously doing more damage. That is'nt even debateable. Plus a KD. Your anecdotal evidence of I was there, HBO was high, is about as useful as two squirts of piss in a bucket.

                2. Effective aggresiveness. Nope. Remind me again who stalked who around the ring all night and was highly effective.

                3. Ring Generalship. I would say this is a wash. Depends on if you like GGG's use of the jab to control distance or Danny's movement to keep GGG from being able to land his big bombs. I think both did well in executing their game plan at different points throughout the fight.

                4. Defense. Again probably a wash, neither were great defensively. Not bad either, but can't say one or the other stood out over the course of the fight.

                You also keep bringing up Tyrone doing such and such to someboby, but I think you are just projecting. Maybe Billy Bob made you squeel like a pig?

                Comment


                • #28
                  Golovkin has looked less sharp and less athletic for at least 3 or 4 fights now. He's getting past his "sell by" date soon.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    So you want Jacobs/GGG rematch.
                    But how many years would the negotiations would take?
                    The first one took a year because Jacobs demanded a lot of things.

                    The rematch would probably take 5 years especially now that Jacobs thought he won the fight. He already behaved like he's the A side in the first fight, he'll behave like A side plus in the rematch.

                    Forget the rematch lad. Waste of time.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by DreamerUSA View Post
                      Lol

                      By the 4 criteria used to score rounds, what exactly was Danny dominating?

                      1.Clean effective punches. Nope. Not only did GGG land more, his punches were obviously doing more damage. That is'nt even debateable. Plus a KD. Your anecdotal evidence of I was there, HBO was high, is about as useful as two squirts of piss in a bucket.

                      2. Effective aggresiveness. Nope. Remind me again who stalked who around the ring all night and was highly effective.

                      3. Ring Generalship. I would say this is a wash. Depends on if you like GGG's use of the jab to control distance or Danny's movement to keep GGG from being able to land his big bombs. I think both did well in executing their game plan at different points throughout the fight.

                      4. Defense. Again probably a wash, neither were great defensively. Not bad either, but can't say one or the other stood out over the course of the fight.

                      You also keep bringing up Tyrone doing such and such to someboby, but I think you are just projecting. Maybe Billy Bob made you squeel like a pig?
                      Are you seriously ******ed? Serious question.

                      Jacobs landed the cleaner shots to the body and face. For each clean punch landed by GG, Jacobs would come back and land 3-6 punches and back GGG up from one side of the ring to the other.

                      There was a reason why for every notable boxing website round by round, 98% of the fans had Jacobs winning. Now run and tell me what happen in slow motion, b1tch

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP