Comments Thread For: De La Hoya: Canelo vs. Golovkin is a Trilogy Type of Fight

[Raimondo]

Translation: I don't have anymore fights that will generate a profit

LOL. Oscar is gonna milk his gingerboy even if he gets KTFO in 1st rd by GGG saying that the fight was action-packed and Canelo was ahead on scorecards till he got KTFO. ))

[Willy Wanker]

Nonsense.

The only reason De La Hoya would make a trilogy out of GGG-Canelo is to give Canelo three chances to beat GGG.

If Canelo wins in September, there won't even be a second GGG-Canelo fight with a Cotto rematch and a Lemieux fight available for Canelo.

[maracho]

Which means he's been softening up the ref and judges to the thought of making sure the three fights happen because three fights is good for the fans, good for Golovkin, good for everyone, but especially good for Oscar

[Graz]

Does anyone get that pre-**** feeling that if it goes to the score cards, Canelo wins? This sets up a huge rematch for more money.

Unfortunately I would have to say yes

[maracho]

Im sure the golden boys and their proposed refs are studying Tony Weeks tapes big time.

Oh and Abel, beware the Big Bear ninjas

[richardt]

The fighters are often just pawns to a greater scheme. If GGG wins a controversial decision, there is a rematch. If it is a close fight and Canelo wins, there wont be a rematch unless Oscar sees big dollars. I think the odds of either a quick stoppage or cut or bad decision or anything else like this is high. Too many big fights end with controversy. We need a clear decision or a clear KO for such a big fight that promises so much action from both fighters.