Listen, I didn't want to go there, but it seems I am going to have to.
I see a lot of posters ****ing on Wilder for not taking Hearns offer and coming across the pond to fight Whyte.
On the surface, this would seem the right reaction.
Hell, maybe he should just take the money and KHTFO.
But, we are supposed to be better than that.
We are supposed to be hard core fans who understand at least some of the nuances in our sport when it comes to promotion and matchmaking.
It isn't as simple as Deontay just "taking the money".
And when you really start asking a few questions, it starts to unravel from anything making sense.
So let me get this straight:
Hearns wants a champion (Wilder) who is much higher profile than Charles Martin (who he gave 8.5M to for a fight with AJ) to "prove his marketability" by fighting Dillan Whyte for just 3M? This after he promised Wilder a shot at AJ already? Why isn't Hearn offering Wilder the same 10M Wlad got and doing another huge fight in Wembley? Does anyone doubt it would be huge?
There is no rematch clause that Wlad can invoke. AJ is free to fight Wilder next if he wants to and he should want to.
You can't sit there and wonder why Wilder isn't grabbing that 3M without ALSO WONDERING why Hearn isn't making arguably the biggest fight that can be made in the division (yes, I know a Wlad rematch is just as big or bigger, but Klitschko is oddly silent about getting in there again and a fight with Wilder win or lose won't make that rematch much less of a fight).
In other words, if you are calling Wilder a duck for not taking the fight with Whyte, why aren't you calling out AJ for not pressing for a fight with Deontay?
I see a lot of posters ****ing on Wilder for not taking Hearns offer and coming across the pond to fight Whyte.
On the surface, this would seem the right reaction.
Hell, maybe he should just take the money and KHTFO.
But, we are supposed to be better than that.
We are supposed to be hard core fans who understand at least some of the nuances in our sport when it comes to promotion and matchmaking.
It isn't as simple as Deontay just "taking the money".
And when you really start asking a few questions, it starts to unravel from anything making sense.
So let me get this straight:
Hearns wants a champion (Wilder) who is much higher profile than Charles Martin (who he gave 8.5M to for a fight with AJ) to "prove his marketability" by fighting Dillan Whyte for just 3M? This after he promised Wilder a shot at AJ already? Why isn't Hearn offering Wilder the same 10M Wlad got and doing another huge fight in Wembley? Does anyone doubt it would be huge?
There is no rematch clause that Wlad can invoke. AJ is free to fight Wilder next if he wants to and he should want to.
You can't sit there and wonder why Wilder isn't grabbing that 3M without ALSO WONDERING why Hearn isn't making arguably the biggest fight that can be made in the division (yes, I know a Wlad rematch is just as big or bigger, but Klitschko is oddly silent about getting in there again and a fight with Wilder win or lose won't make that rematch much less of a fight).
In other words, if you are calling Wilder a duck for not taking the fight with Whyte, why aren't you calling out AJ for not pressing for a fight with Deontay?
Comment