Comments Thread For: Canelo: I Have To Be Smart, Elusive, Not Stand in Front of GGG
Collapse
-
So. Would Floyd deserve more credit for beating the new, improved 2017 Canelo or the version he beat back in 2013?
Let's say Floyd beat a super green 19 y/o Canelo... would he be able to claim credit for every success that Canelo went on to achieve over the next 20 years? Does Clinton Mitchell take credit for BHops entire career?
You need to up your game, fanchild
None of which matters of course, because you'll never be able to erase the stench of this sloppy turd which you curled out on your own carpet:

no, he will claim credit for beating the name/fighter that Canelo will become, albeit earlier in his career
e.g.
being known for beating a superstar/legend on the up, is better than beating say..... Jeff Horn, or Dominic Wade
great wins by Canelo will reflect well on Mayweather, in hindsight
it really is that simple
I always said that casual fans are ignorant about styles/levels/weight, but I guess they aren't the only things
for the record..... evaluating the worth of a win, in order to determine a fighters level of greatness, is the most basic element that makes up boxing history..... that really is obvious.... and yet, you are officially on record as not being aware of that fact
no wonder you have an appalling track record and say such silly things..... you guys who are still learning the sport need to stop being fanboys, and stop listening to the tards
just to show how much of a fool you are.....
you said this.....
and Cliff Rold corrected you by saying this.....
"The Hopkins win looked to some in April like a case of Hopkins age as much as Calzaghe’s quality but, following the 43-year old Hopkins drubbing 26-year old Middleweight champion Kelly Pavlik in October, raises in estimation to the level of other of Calzaghe’s biggest wins.".....
By Cliff Rold - It shouldn’t matter, but it did. Logic said Joe Calzaghe, while only three years younger, had too much in the tank to be troubled much by a man who still looks like Roy Jones Jr. (52-5, 38 KO) but doesn’t fight much like him anymore. Boxing though is a sport where passions and memories run deep and seeing is believing. Beating big names is often as important as beating better challenges without them. The nature of Calzaghe’s win over Jones, sans logic, is forcing tons of conversation about his place in history which really made just as much sense a week ago.
what a dumbass koba !!
all fun-n-games til someone loses an eye, huh ?
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
It's all good, brother, and you're still avoiding the point. Right or wrong the Calzaghe dude was still being a fanboy (although I suspect he was trolling) which is all I'm saying about you - and at least he had the defense that Hopkins was arguably getting worse not better, although I'd still say it was a shaky argument. I'll say it to Rold too if you like.no, he will claim credit for beating the name/fighter that Canelo will become, albeit earlier in his career
e.g.
being known for beating a superstar/legend on the up, is better than beating say..... Jeff Horn, or Dominic Wade
great wins by Canelo will reflect well on Mayweather, in hindsight
it really is that simple
I always said that casual fans are ignorant about styles/levels/weight, but I guess they aren't the only things
for the record..... evaluating the worth of a win, in order to determine a fighters level of greatness, is the most basic element that makes up boxing history..... that really is obvious.... and yet, you are officially on record as not being aware of that fact
no wonder you have an appalling track record and say such silly things..... you guys who are still learning the sport need to stop being fanboys, and stop listening to the tards
just to show how much of a fool you are.....
you said this.....
and Cliff Rold corrected you by saying this.....
"The Hopkins win looked to some in April like a case of Hopkins age as much as Calzaghe’s quality but, following the 43-year old Hopkins drubbing 26-year old Middleweight champion Kelly Pavlik in October, raises in estimation to the level of other of Calzaghe’s biggest wins.".....
By Cliff Rold - It shouldn’t matter, but it did. Logic said Joe Calzaghe, while only three years younger, had too much in the tank to be troubled much by a man who still looks like Roy Jones Jr. (52-5, 38 KO) but doesn’t fight much like him anymore. Boxing though is a sport where passions and memories run deep and seeing is believing. Beating big names is often as important as beating better challenges without them. The nature of Calzaghe’s win over Jones, sans logic, is forcing tons of conversation about his place in history which really made just as much sense a week ago.
what a dumbass koba !!
all fun-n-games til someone loses an eye, huh ?
Now. Don't you think you'd better clean that mess off your rug instead of pretending it ain't there? Someone might do themselves an injury.Comment
-
It's all good, brother, and you're still avoiding the point. Right or wrong the Calzaghe dude was still being a fanboy (although I suspect he was trolling) which is all I'm saying about you - and at least he had the defense that Hopkins was arguably getting worse not better, although I'd still say it was a shaky argument. I'll say it to Rold too if you like.
Now. Don't you think you'd better clean that mess off your rug instead of pretending it ain't there? Someone might do themselves an injury.
so, you had 3 options.....
1) he is being a fanboy
2) he is trolling
3) he is correct
you picked wrong, as proven.....
experienced heads know better
you definitely should leave it
I will move on
peaceComment
-
The 3 things ain't mutually exclusive, man. People prove that here on the daily. But yeah. It's time to move on. Peace, man.Comment


Comment