Why are you guys so high on Diego Corrales?

[Diego Rodriguez]

You're fighting ghosts. There's nothing for me to be butthurt about. I said four years, not three years and change. Let me know when you pick up your e-trophy for this glorious victory.

In the meantime, a great win for Floyd and a great redemption story for Corrales, coming back to win the title and then move up and win another.

Instead of simply saying yeah you were incorrect you tell me nonsense. I wasn't trying to pick a fight simply just correcting you.

We don't disagree that it was a great win for Floyd and Corrales came back and did great things.

[DuttyAlacrity]

He was a top 10 p4p fighter When Floyd beat him man

No. 5 to be exac. RIP DA GAWD CHICO!!!

[IMDAZED]

Instead of simply saying yeah you were incorrect you tell me nonsense. I wasn't trying to pick a fight simply just correcting you.

We don't disagree that it was a great win for Floyd and Corrales came back and did great things.

3.2 years compared to 4 doesn't change the point I was trying to make so of course I'm going to call you an assclown. If someone says "he hasn't fought in forever," you're the type to be like, "actually, it's 2 years and 3 months, not forever." So no, I'm not going to thank you for nitpicking, I'm going to tell you to get a grip.

[Diego Rodriguez]

3.2 years compared to 4 doesn't change the point I was trying to make so of course I'm going to call you an assclown. If someone says "he hasn't fought in forever," you're the type to be like, "actually, it's 2 years and 3 months, not forever." So no, I'm not going to thank you for nitpicking, I'm going to tell you to get a grip.

In the initial post I said you simply had a fact wrong. You came back and said no you didn't. I pointed it out and even said "Total is a little over 3 years not 4 years. Not a big deal but it wasn't 4 years." Instead of just being a man and saying yeah I was wrong you got to start acting like a little btch.

If you are going to use specific data have it right. It wasn't a big deal as I said and I agreed with the premise. You're the one who simply couldn't handle a correction and made yourself look like the fool when the facts showed you were wrong.

[Larry the boss]

He was an undefeated p4p fighter when Floyd beat him..

wins over

Castillo
Casamayor
Freitas
Manfredy
Robert Garcia

2 time champ at 130
unified champ at 135

damn that aint to shabby

[IMDAZED]

In the initial post I said you simply had a fact wrong. You came back and said no you didn't. I pointed it out and even said "Total is a little over 3 years not 4 years. Not a big deal but it wasn't 4 years." Instead of just being a man and saying yeah I was wrong you got to start acting like a little btch.

If you are going to use specific data have it right. It wasn't a big deal as I said and I agreed with the premise. You're the one who simply couldn't handle a correction and made yourself look like the fool when the facts showed you were wrong.

You think nitpicking that makes you a man? Weird. It's not about right or wrong, it's about whether it's about whether the accuracy down to the month is relevant. Whether 3.2 years or 4, it had been years and that was the point.

[Diego Rodriguez]

You think nitpicking that makes you a man? Weird. It's not about right or wrong, it's about whether it's about whether the accuracy down to the month is relevant. Whether 3.2 years or 4, it had been years and that was the point.

Do you have a problem with English comprehension?

"Instead of just being a man and saying yeah I was wrong you got to start acting like a little btch."

I bolded it for you. Being a man is admitting you were wrong. Hell if you didn't say anything I wouldn't have said a thing after. You came back and said you weren't wrong I showed you were wrong and then you said nonsense obviously butt hurt despite me saying it was no big deal. We all make mistakes on facts sometimes. We don't need to get all defensive. If I'd have said it was 2 years and someone showed me I was wrong, I'd just have said thanks for the correction but my point still stands.

[IMDAZED]

Do you have a problem with English comprehension?

"Instead of just being a man and saying yeah I was wrong you got to start acting like a little btch."

I bolded it for you. Being a man is admitting you were wrong. Hell if you didn't say anything I wouldn't have said a thing after. You came back and said you weren't wrong I showed you were wrong and then you said nonsense obviously butt hurt despite me saying it was no big deal. We all make mistakes on facts sometimes. We don't need to get all defensive. If I'd have said it was 2 years and someone showed me I was wrong, I'd just have said thanks for the correction but my point still stands.

You're confusing my being incredulous with being defensive. You just want to hear a random internet poster say, "Yes, you're right on a nitpick point that obstructs the bigger statement?" I'm concerned with the big picture, not nailing down the time apart by the exact month (when we're talking years). So if you were expecting some sort of "Oh my God, you're right!" on something so pedantic then keep waiting and think what you want.

Peace.

[Diego Rodriguez]

You're confusing my being incredulous with being defensive. You just want to hear a random internet poster say, "Yes, you're right on a nitpick point that obstructs the bigger statement?" I'm concerned with the big picture, not nailing down the time apart by the exact month (when we're talking years). So if you were expecting some sort of "Oh my God, you're right!" on something so pedantic then keep waiting and think what you want.

Peace.

Stop trying to play it off dude. You said you weren't wrong factually when I first pointed it out. You didn't say crap about nitpicking or anything in your initial response to me. Only after my second post that showed you were factually wrong did you start with the "incredulous" act. Some people can walk and chew gum. They can make the bigger point while having their facts correct. And if their facts aren't correct and get corrected they don't lose their crap. But if you can't no problem.

[IMDAZED]

Stop trying to play it off dude. You said you weren't wrong factually when I first pointed it out. You didn't say crap about nitpicking or anything in your initial response to me. Only after my second post that showed you were factually wrong did you start with the "incredulous" act. Some people can walk and chew gum. They can make the bigger point while having their facts correct. And if their facts aren't correct and get corrected they don't lose their crap. But if you can't no problem.

I stopped reading after the first sentence. Take care.