Floyd vs Mcgregor odds are RIDICULOUS.

[USMCer]

@ Eff Pandas

I'm directing this at the people talking that Conor has "no chance."



(I'm sure the Mayweather money will start coming in soon)

[USMCer]

can you explain what does it mean in real life, bcz some ppl like me never understand it
so, it's +400 Floyd, UD. If you bet $100 on Floyd UD, how much you win, and vice versa for Connor bet and win?

If you bet 100 on Floyd you get 25 back I believe if he wins.

http://www.oddsshark.com/tools/odds-calculator

No.

+400 means...
You bet 100, you win 400.
You actually get back 500 (400 plus your 100 back)

-400 means...
You bet 400, you win 100 (or bet 100, you win 25), etc

[Eff Pandas]

"In fairness" I was being fair...

First of all,
That's the way betting odds work. That's the way they worked for Andre Berto, Floyd was a -3000 favorite... against Maidana, Floyd was -900 and -600... against Canelo, Floyd was -300 (the odds try to draw two-way action).

Secondly,
A "0% chance to win" means there is NO CHANCE OF LOSING betting on Floyd. Unless those people saying that are just flapping their lips.

And lastly,
In business, a 12% return-on-investment is pretty decent. At -900 you'd be talking 11.1%. At -800 it'd be 12.5%. The odds on Bovada are currently down to -550, that's 18.2%. Invest $1000 today, get back $182 in two months!?... that's an outstanding ROI, especially for something with (supposedly) a "0% chance" of losing.

Where's that action from Boxing "experts"???

I think you are misunderstanding me or simply ignoring my legit points. At the odds offered if one is running at more than 11% ROI (assuming the -900 odds) with their sports betting it doesn't make sense to bet on Floyd to win even if it is 100% to happen assuming one has limited resources as I imagine us all to have. You are giving up money by doing so. Plus nothing is 100%. Thats a dummy conversation to be having.

If you are just lowering yourself to the dummy level or are a dummy (you're a new guy or alt I got no idea your agenda or IQ) with the people saying Conor has 0.00% chance to win than fair play, continue talking directly to the dummies. I'm talking real sh^t doe.

[USMCer]

I think you are misunderstanding me or simply ignoring my legit points. At the odds offered if one is running at more than 11% ROI (assuming the -900 odds) with their sports betting it doesn't make sense to bet on Floyd to win even if it is 100% to happen assuming one has limited resources as I imagine us all to have. You are giving up money by doing so. Plus nothing is 100%. Thats a dummy conversation to be having.

If you are just lowering yourself to the dummy level or are a dummy (you're a new guy or alt I got no idea your agenda or IQ) with the people saying Conor has 0.00% chance to win than fair play, continue talking directly to the dummies. I'm talking real sh^t doe.

See my next post^
I am/was talking directly to the dummies... for those saying "0% chance" (see original post)...

But the thing is, I think there are A LOT of these people... people who otherwise aren't "dummies."



Kellerman might have a $100,000 bet with Brendan Schaub (MMA fighter/rookie commentator) that Conor won't land a punch.

[Eff Pandas]

See my next post^
I am/was talking directly to the dummies... for those saying "0% chance" (see original post)...

But the thing is, I think there are A LOT of these people... people who otherwise aren't "dummies."

Fair enough your dummy audience awaits you. No empty seats in that venue.

And yea I was kinda disappointed that Max said something so clearly ******ed. I saw that idiot guy from Tha Boxing Voice & CTG from the Breakfast Club & Brilliant Idiots land punches on Shawn Porter in sparing last year & I'm not sure either of those guys ever had gloves on in their life before that day.

And randomly I just made a ****** Floyd vs Conor fantasy betting thread for those who think a bunch of dumb sh^t about this fight & I'm open for suggestions on other wildly outrageous takes on this fight.