Jim Lampley on Ward-Kovalev

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Larry the boss
    EDUCATED
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jan 2011
    • 90798
    • 6,419
    • 4,473
    • 2,500,480

    #1

    Jim Lampley on Ward-Kovalev

  • Mammoth
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2016
    • 35676
    • 3,828
    • 3,378
    • 378,304

    #2
    They still won't listen...

    Comment

    • Curt Henning
      Undisputed Champion
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Mar 2017
      • 11440
      • 551
      • 24
      • 176,018

      #3
      the boxing media in general has praised ward......but thats not enough....when they gobble ggg and make excuses their word is bond....but now they are ignored

      Comment

      • ironmt
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Sep 2006
        • 3409
        • 153
        • 81
        • 10,887

        #4
        Nothing that we don't already know or disagree with. Jim Lampley Is the man, with a ton of boxing knowledge and It Is kind of Ironic that he Is the one being used to make your point considering he Is bashed every other day on this board. Oh well, use It to fit your agenda.

        No one disagrees that Kovalev was finised, they are disagreeing with the stoppage ending on an Illegal blow.

        Comment

        • BrometheusBob.
          All Time Great
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Apr 2015
          • 20457
          • 915
          • 1,915
          • 156,555

          #5
          What you Ward-turds don't seem to understand is that I am only interested in the technicalities of the rules. It doesn't matter if Kov was trying to quit or completely out of the fight before the last few punches. If the glove was any bit below the belt in the last punch, Ward has to be DQ'd. Simple as that.


          When will you guys learn

          Comment

          • Code Red
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Feb 2011
            • 2510
            • 145
            • 4
            • 53,291

            #6
            Originally posted by BrometheusBob.
            What you Ward-turds don't seem to understand is that I am only interested in the technicalities of the rules. It doesn't matter if Kov was trying to quit or completely out of the fight before the last few punches. If the glove was any bit below the belt in the last punch, Ward has to be DQ'd. Simple as that.


            When will you guys learn
            Why, cause you don't like Ward? Boxers get DQ'd for intentional fouls with multiple warnings, that doesn't describe Ward-Kovalev II. Ward didn't intentionally do anything but beat Kovalev's azz!

            Comment

            • BrometheusBob.
              All Time Great
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Apr 2015
              • 20457
              • 915
              • 1,915
              • 156,555

              #7
              Originally posted by Code Red
              Why, cause you don't like Ward? Boxers get DQ'd for intentional low blows with multiple warnings, that doesn't describe Ward-Kovalev II.
              The fact that Ward's last punch was low proves Kovalev is the superior fighter. If the TKO is not overturned soon I will lose all respect for this rigged sport.

              Some day you'll all wake up and realize that Kovalev really won this fight fair and square

              Comment

              • Code Red
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Feb 2011
                • 2510
                • 145
                • 4
                • 53,291

                #8
                Originally posted by BrometheusBob.
                The fact that Ward's last punch was low proves Kovalev is the superior fighter. If the TKO is not overturned soon I will lose all respect for this rigged sport.

                Some day you'll all wake up and realize that Kovalev really won this fight fair and square
                Do we have to watch it in slow motion to see Kovalev winning?

                Comment

                • BrometheusBob.
                  All Time Great
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Apr 2015
                  • 20457
                  • 915
                  • 1,915
                  • 156,555

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Code Red
                  Do we have to watch it in slow motion to see Kovalev winning?


                  I recommend watching it backwards. As the fight plays, you'll hear the commentary getting more and more positive for Kovalev, allowing you to feel the relief of Kovalev taking over the fight. It helps me sleep at night.

                  Comment

                  • iamboxing
                    ******a facking game
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Dec 2016
                    • 6421
                    • 672
                    • 760
                    • 29,458

                    #10
                    Jim Lampley is a good commentator, but he's also emotional and lets it get in the way sometimes. His bias was glaringly obvious when Naseem Hamed and Mayweather were on the scene. He hated them with a passion - for no reason whatsoever. A good blow by blow and humorous commentator, but skews his opinion when he talks about boxers he simply doesn't like for personal reasons.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP