MMA safer than boxing ???

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bonafide
    The General
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • May 2006
    • 2233
    • 72
    • 35
    • 9,032

    #41
    Originally posted by loui_ludwig
    If u read my post again, i posted "There is also ranking in welterweight and lightweight". I did not type those fighters because to much to type. But just 4 u, here u go.

    Welterweight 155 to 160:
    Matt Hughes
    George St. Pierre
    BJ Penn
    Frank Trigg(i believed he retired this year)
    Sean Sherk

    Lighweight 145 to 154:
    Takanori Gomi
    Hayto Sakurai
    Joachin Hansen
    Mark Hominick
    Yves Edwars

    This ratings was from Full Contact Fighter April Edition(so its 1-2 months old), The May edition is out already but don't have it yet. I am gonna buy it sometimes this week. The ratins changes every month. Gomi was choked out in his last fight so at the current ratings, his not #1 anymore.

    I didnt say you typed it just looked off. If that was a cut and paste from a magazine then IMO there ratings are ****ed up. lol

    Comment

    • AREALFIGHTER
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Dec 2005
      • 1532
      • 44
      • 32
      • 7,994

      #42
      Originally posted by Bonafide
      First and foremost I am a die hard boxing fan and prefer the sweet science over MMA but for those of you who think that boxing is a much safer sport than MMA should read this.





      Mixed Martial Art is a sport; it’s a mix of all martial arts. If you had a wrestling, karate or boxing event no one would have issues, why is it an issue when you mixed all of these in one event? People might say yeah they have small gloves, they is a good thing, this mean when someone gets hit hard once, its over. Unlike boxing where you get hit over and over, this is not good for your brain at all. Boxing you win by getting KO’ed or towel thrown in (which means your corner had enough of watching you get killed). In MMA if you are in trouble you can protect yourself by holding on to the guy (not boxing), in MMA if you don’t like getting hit you can take the guy down (not in boxing), in MMA when you had enough you can quit by tapping (not in boxing), in MMA if you don’t defend yourself intelligently the ref will step in and stop the fight (rare in boxing, they usually wait until you get KO’ed). Mixed Martial Fighters are educated, smart and very respectable human being. Don’t judge a book by its cover, doesn’t mean because you fight in cage you take that to the streets after. Let the sport grow, use that to bring money in your city, make more events. Both the fans and the cities can benefit from this, its revenue, it can be BIG revenue. My point is, there is nothing wrong with this sport, no one ever died from MMA. Lets make this sport grow, isn’t this a free country…
      the gloves make little diffrence on the pressure being exerted on the place where the punch landed. bone is harder than glove but the pressure is similar, the crushing shock is taken away by the gloves but not the concusive force. both have the same force but a smaller glove will do more superficial damage because of contact area. ie cut and break skin beacuse a smaller area has to deal with the force. same principal of why bullets kill people very small dense object, "fist without glove" vs bean bags moving at the same rate of speed or force and not causing damage.

      Comment

      • loui_ludwig
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Oct 2005
        • 7669
        • 184
        • 2
        • 19,376

        #43
        Originally posted by Bonafide
        I didnt say you typed it just looked off. If that was a cut and paste from a magazine then IMO there ratings are ****ed up. lol
        Remember this is 1-2 months old. So the current ratings is diffirent. I typed it cuz can't find the ratings in the website.

        Comment

        • domin0
          Amateur
          Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
          • Mar 2006
          • 2
          • 4
          • 0
          • 6,222

          #44
          " It's not one punch that will kill you, its the accumulation of punch after punch after punch."

          Fighting isnt about power or accumulation of punches its about getting hit in the right spot and a clean blow to the top of the nose would push a bone in your brain and kill a man and there are lots of deadly strikes that every experienced fighter knows of, my dad used to box and taught me some but was strict about me never using them while playing or even in real fights at school or teaching them to friends, any real boxer would tell you the exact thing.

          Comment

          • Built 2 Last
            WBC Champion
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • May 2006
            • 535
            • 43
            • 49
            • 6,885

            #45
            nah its not safer...n its more expensive

            Comment

            • the traveler
              gone skygazing
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Feb 2006
              • 1528
              • 65
              • 30
              • 8,300

              #46
              Originally posted by AREALFIGHTER
              the gloves make little diffrence on the pressure being exerted on the place where the punch landed. bone is harder than glove but the pressure is similar, the crushing shock is taken away by the gloves but not the concusive force. both have the same force but a smaller glove will do more superficial damage because of contact area. ie cut and break skin beacuse a smaller area has to deal with the force. same principal of why bullets kill people very small dense object, "fist without glove" vs bean bags moving at the same rate of speed or force and not causing damage.

              While a MMA glove may cause more superficial damage, it will also stop the fight sooner than a boxing glove because of the argument that you gave. A smaller glove will do more crunching damage to bone, whereas a boxing glove may hit with the same force but the padding of the glove limits the crunching ability of the blow; I think that people will fall quicker when hit with a crunching shot than a dull shot, thus the boxing match is prolonged, causing more pressure on the brain to be substained.

              Comment

              • Run
                Outlaw
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Feb 2005
                • 56190
                • 2,588
                • 4,569
                • 76,412

                #47
                This is ridiculous.

                Of course boxing is more dangerous. Boxers spend the entire fight on their feet......striking.

                MMA fights go to the ground and end in sub. Even if a guy gets g'n'p'd he's not absorbing as much damage to the brain....as if he were taking blows to the head for an hour.



                Never pay again for live sex! | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! | Chat for free!

                Comment

                • Southpaw Stinger
                  Trousersnake Fondler
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Dec 2005
                  • 25730
                  • 947
                  • 536
                  • 37,838

                  #48
                  This is ridiculous.
                  Of course boxing is more dangerous. Boxers spend the entire fight on their feet......striking.

                  MMA fights go to the ground and end in sub. Even if a guy gets g'n'p'd he's not absorbing as much damage to the brain....as if he were taking blows to the head for an hour.
                  Definatly agreed.

                  Comment

                  • Bluto Blutarsky
                    Amateur
                    Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
                    • Jul 2006
                    • 7
                    • 5
                    • 0
                    • 6,231

                    #49
                    define "safe".

                    Are we talking long term health concerns or short term?

                    I think in the long term boxing is definately more dangerous.

                    In the short term I would say MMA because there is much more potential to take greater damage, have something broken or hit the ground wrong. A sub isn't a sub because it just "hurts" a sub is a sub because if you don't submit you get choked or something gets broken.
                    Last edited by Bluto Blutarsky; 07-13-2006, 03:10 PM. Reason: add.

                    Comment

                    • TheEvilSaint
                      I Dub Thee UNFORGIVEN
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Jun 2005
                      • 6713
                      • 228
                      • 210
                      • 13,450

                      #50
                      i dunno if its safer, but its a ****load more entertaining than boxing.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP