Comments Thread For: Joshua Granted IBF Exception, Must Rematch Klitschko By Dec 2

[aboutfkntime]

I'm very happy to answer your direct question. My first language is English. Since I answered your direct question, surely you should do the same. What is your first language?




You're lying. You said Duva could have been given step aside money. When I pointed out that the IBF doesn't allow step aside money, you ignored it. When I pointed out there was no legal way to make Duva wait after she demanded the purse bid, you ignored it.




Your posts are littered with nonsense, so I quote what little substance your posts contain and then I address what I quoted. You on the other hand quoted my lengthy reply and then refused to address any of my positions. You offered no response to the IBF not allowing step aside money. You offered no response to the IBF having no legal way to sanction Fury-Klitschko II once Duva demands the purse bid. You offered no response to me pointing out that Duva would have easily secured a federal injunction just as others in her position have successfully obtained in similar circumstances. You offered no response to me pointing out that Pulev's promoter chose a different course of action, which is what allowed an exemption to be possible. Etc etc.




I've never claimed to be a master, but I have a lot of experience working in the industry. I never boxed and you never see me commenting on boxing techniques or boxing skills. That is not my forte. But I do know the rules of the sanctioning bodies. I am in regular contact with many of the heads of the sanctioning bodies. I am fully qualified to explain why you have no idea what you're talking about when it comes to IBF rules, previous lawsuits involving the sanctioning bodies, what the courts have ruled over and over, etc.




I am here because I am paid to be here. So you do know why I am here because I've told you many times.

nah, go fk yourself

[aboutfkntime]

I'm very happy to answer your direct question. My first language is English. Since I answered your direct question, surely you should do the same. What is your first language?




You're lying. You said Duva could have been given step aside money. When I pointed out that the IBF doesn't allow step aside money, you ignored it. When I pointed out there was no legal way to make Duva wait after she demanded the purse bid, you ignored it.




Your posts are littered with nonsense, so I quote what little substance your posts contain and then I address what I quoted. You on the other hand quoted my lengthy reply and then refused to address any of my positions. You offered no response to the IBF not allowing step aside money. You offered no response to the IBF having no legal way to sanction Fury-Klitschko II once Duva demands the purse bid. You offered no response to me pointing out that Duva would have easily secured a federal injunction just as others in her position have successfully obtained in similar circumstances. You offered no response to me pointing out that Pulev's promoter chose a different course of action, which is what allowed an exemption to be possible. Etc etc.




I've never claimed to be a master, but I have a lot of experience working in the industry. I never boxed and you never see me commenting on boxing techniques or boxing skills. That is not my forte. But I do know the rules of the sanctioning bodies. I am in regular contact with many of the heads of the sanctioning bodies. I am fully qualified to explain why you have no idea what you're talking about when it comes to IBF rules, previous lawsuits involving the sanctioning bodies, what the courts have ruled over and over, etc.




I am here because I am paid to be here. So you do know why I am here because I've told you many times.

then..... fk off kid, you are an idiot

like I asked, why are you even here..... ?

it was clearly obvious you are not a boxing guy

and who the hell would pay you 2c..... you non-boxing rules-doe ***wit?

[aboutfkntime]

[ShoulderRoll]

The IBF doesn't allow step aside fees.

The IBF is open to exemptions on mandatories, as long as the exemption is requested before a purse bid is called.

Their actions in both the Fury and Joshua situations were strictly by the rulebook and totally predictable. That kind of transparency and dependability should be applauded.

[original zero]

The IBF doesn't allow step aside fees.

The IBF is open to exemptions on mandatories, as long as the exemption is requested before a purse bid is called.

Their actions in both the Fury and Joshua situations were strictly by the rulebook and totally predictable. That kind of transparency and dependability should be applauded.

lol lmk when our friend about time is willing to address the facts

[SN!PER]

Paid the cost to be the Josh

[aboutfkntime]

"you never see me commenting on boxing techniques or boxing skills. That is not my forte."