Originally posted by Freedef
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Joshua Granted IBF Exception, Must Rematch Klitschko By Dec 2
Collapse
-
-
-
Originally posted by The plunger man View Postas a gentleman and scholar like yourself i will offer you a chance to win your money back as its only fair but i will leave that down to you m8.
If you do decide to bet we will keep it the same terms and stake and may the best man win , but my advice to you brother is save your money because wlad will be older and further away from his prime and joshua will have gained so much knowledge from the 1st fight and knows how to handle wlad in the rematch...joshua wins inside 6 rounds if he remains calm.....WAR JOSHUA
If the rematch happens I'll keep you posted.. I want to see how Wlad is during the training before I make up my mind about betting.. You know I like AJ and really hoped they hadn't fought as a fan of both..
I'd take Wlad over Joshua again but will I put money on him will have to be seen..
Comment
-
Originally posted by rulesHearn and Sauerland are on good terms. I'm sure Sauerland has a reasonable idea of what Pulev would make fighting Joshua and what he would make fighting Takam.
There's no guarantee Pulev would beat Takam. So it would be a risk whereas even if Pulev loses to Joshua, there is a fortune to be made.
what an utter ****.....
you made a right cvnt of yourself by arguing for DAYS that Joshua should be stripped if he rematches Klitschko, as Pulev deserves his shot because "rules doe"..... but, now you.....
1) don't even think that bum can beat Takam
2) have completely changed your mind because "rules doe"
so, the IBF were capable of coming to a common-sense decision..... but, you had to ask them, officially
you on the hand, were officially asked to use some common-sense..... but, you refused HAHAHA
flip-flopping little twat LMAO
it is hilarious that the rules of a second-rate sanctioning body are more important to you than securing a top fight
Comment
-
Originally posted by Randall Cunning View PostHearn said a couple of days ago Crawford/Indongo is for all the belts, weaved his magic on that one aswell
Comment
-
Originally posted by NahMean View PostNo doubt Hearn gave both IBF and Pulev a FAT brown envelope. He can afford to as AJ vs Vlad fight will make millions. But Crawford/Indongo?? Its a hardcore fans fight.. I don’t see him paying fat cheques to keep it for all the belts especially since Indongo isn’t his fighter.
Comment
-
Here's a clue for you clueless dudes on here who are talking about Wilder and the rest. When AJ and Klitschko first signed the contract, there was a rematch clause in it. AJ won. So now Klitschko can rematch if he wants to. The IBF, WBA and IBO belts that were won had to be sorted out because there are mandatories waiting like Pulev and Ortiz, who both want some of that AJ money haha. Hearn got the OK to skip the WBA mandatory Ortiz, but needed the option to skip Pulev and the IBF mandatory too in order to keep the belts when/if Wladimir chose to rematch him. Yesterday the IBF granted the exception, largely due to the money that will be flowing in from the fight. So in summary, AJ isn't ducking anyone, he's fighting while keeping his belts. Both things that Fury didn't do. Meanwhile Wilder is still fighting bums, Parker is fighting in New Zealand and Briggs hasn't been heard from since he got caught...again
Comment
-
Comment