GGG ''I Want Big..Unification-Saunders Fight..(but).I'm More Respect To Mandatory..''

[Robbie Barrett]

As Much as I hate it GGG has a good point. IBF is too strict.......

IBF prioritises unification over mandatory. No Excuse.

[UNBIASED BOXING]

Golovkin is not a business man though, he respects box.

How is Canelo vs. GGG not respecting boxing? You have two P4P fighters fighting instead of ducking one another.

That doesn't make any sense.

This is the fight all fans want to see. LMAO, you haters just keep calling it a duck no matter what.

[Thraxox]

IBF prioritises unification over mandatory. No Excuse.

Then how do you explain Indongo threatened to be stripped if he pursue a unification against Terrence Crawford?

[Robbie Barrett]

How is Canelo vs. GGG not respecting boxing? You have two P4P fighters fighting instead of ducking one another.

That doesn't make any sense.

All the titles were his dream though, he's not a business man.

[UNBIASED BOXING]

All the titles were his dream though, he's not a business man.

I don't remember him claiming not to be a business man.

You don't have much room here to critize him. Yeah, it's obvious he went with the bigger money scenario, but it's still against a harder opponent. If he wins against Canelo and fights Saunders next (assuming Saunders wins against Khurt), what are you going to say to hate on him next?


Edit: also, you do realize they finalized the fight two weeks prior to Chavez vs Canelo? And that they halted them for a month before those two weeks in respect to Chavez? Meaning they were already talking with GGG about the fight for a while beforehand?

[Robbie Barrett]

I don't remember him claiming not to be a business man.

You don't have much room here to critize him. Yeah, it's obvious he went with the bigger money scenario, but it's still against a harder opponent. If he wins against Canelo and fights Saunders next (assuming Saunders wins against Khurt), what are you going to say to hate on him next?

Says Canelo is a business man, then chooses a business fight over his "goal of all the belts"

"Anyone from 154-168", then turns down Canelo below 160 and Ward.

Makes fun of Canelo for fighting a WW, then does it himself at an higher weight.

The guy is fake and gullible idiots swallow the shit he says.

[OnePunch]

I don't remember him claiming not to be a business man.

You don't have much room here to critize him. Yeah, it's obvious he went with the bigger money scenario, but it's still against a harder opponent. If he wins against Canelo and fights Saunders next (assuming Saunders wins against Khurt), what are you going to say to hate on him next?


Edit: also, you do realize they finalized the fight two weeks prior to Chavez vs Canelo? And that they halted them for a month before those two weeks in respect to Chavez? Meaning they were already talking with GGG about the fight for a while beforehand?

they will say he is ducking Charlo (insane since the guy hasnt even fought at 160 yet) or they will say he is ducking Jacobs rematch....

[Canelo and GGG]

they will say he is ducking Charlo (insane since the guy hasnt even fought at 160 yet) or they will say he is ducking Jacobs rematch....

Same with Nelo ,if he beats GGG he will "duck Charlo and Andrade" its to obvious

[OnePunch]

Same with Nelo ,if he beats GGG he will "duck Charlo and Andrade" its to obvious

and dont forget about ducking Lara rematch either......lol

[Jewish-Reptile]

Golovkin is not a business man though, he respects box.

All the titles were his dream (until he decided he'd rather have money)

He's a prize fighter first and foremost, only an imbecile would face Saunders over Canelo, who's to say the opportunity to face Canelo will present itself again.

Saunders or whoever has the WBO belt at the time of Golovkin fighting again after he's defeated Canelo can be easily negotiated with. I don't understand why anybody would take issue with him fighting the most lucrative opponent in the sport.

You're calling him a hypocrite I get it, who cares or more importantly why does it bother you, does it effect you personally are you emotionally invested in this decision ?