Dumbass I seen the purrity fight,I know purity had rightfully been battered earlier in the fight,but came back & battered klitscho bashing his head in until he looked like he might die on his feet,his eyes almost rolled back. Dumbass stop with assumptions,if I was going to say that about sanders then I would have.
As I wrote in my previous post,why didnt he rematch him then,instead he let his brother beat him up for him 7 fights after. Vitali was far the better brother of the 2.
Its like your arguing for the sake of arguing.
Purity was CLEARLY losing a ONE sided beat down ,you didn't watch shyte .
All of what i've bolded there is indeed fact, but it isn't fact that Klitschko was in his prime when he got those losses, which is also what you claimed. Klitschko was in his prime when Steward tightened up his defence to the extent that he managed to stay unbeaten for 10 whole years. Klitschko was definitely not in his prime when he was 2 years into a professional boxing career. I really don't get how that could even ever be debated. That's not trying to take away Purrity's achievement in defeating Klitschko either, that's more to put some context to what is clearly negative spin regarding Joshua defeating Klitschko on your part.
I also don't agree that the Joshua v Klitschko fight was stopped prematurely considering Klitschko had already been dropped hard twice in that round, but neither one of us can prove either way so that point is just irrelevant.
Where did I say he was in his prime,im well aware of how Steward(Rip legend) turned his career around completely. My point was not to say anything you ASSUME. My point as ive made clear repeatedly is that out of all of Klitschos losses,Joshuas was the least impressive. I never said he was in his prime then,but he surely was more in his prime than at 41 yrs old & 2 yrs layoff after losing to Fury, As I keep repeating,my point is that this win should not reward joshua with top p4p status or him being considered even half of the hype thats been said about him. My point is that what other non british fighter would ever be this hyped after a win over a guy in same circumstances as klitscho.
Purity was CLEARLY losing a ONE sided beat down ,you didn't watch shyte .
Yes you know what Ive watched,dumbass,as I said purrity CAME BACK AFTER GETTING BATTERED,BUT OBVIOUSLY HE WASNT LOSING A ONE SIDED BEATDOWN OR HE WOULDN'T HAVE BASHED KLITSCHO UNTIL HIS EYES ALMOST ROLLED BACK & HIS TRAINER HAD TO STOP IT BEFORE HE DIED ON HIS FEET,YOU HAVNT SEEN THE FIGHT OBVIOUSLY TWAT. THE 11TH RD STILL COUNTS AS PART OF THE FIGHT,& IT COUNTS AS A COMEBACK WHEN YOU TKO in 11th:
Yes you know what Ive watched,dumbass,as I said purrity CAME BACK AFTER GETTING BATTERED,BUT OBVIOUSLY HE WASNT LOSING A ONE SIDED BEATDOWN OR HE WOULDN'T HAVE BASHED KLITSCHO UNTIL HIS EYES ALMOST ROLLED BACK & HIS TRAINER HAD TO STOP IT BEFORE HE DIED ON HIS FEET,YOU HAVNT SEEN THE FIGHT OBVIOUSLY TWAT. THE 11TH RD STILL COUNTS AS PART OF THE FIGHT,& IT COUNTS AS A COMEBACK WHEN YOU TKO in 11th
Yet here you are TRYING to re write history claiming Purity battered him(he didnt even land any type of k.o punch ) and revision of some Purity dominance ,in fact Klitchkos trainer is the one who stopped it , which you already said so put the drugs away , You act as if Wlad who was also only 225 then was outmatched ? you would know this if you actually SAW the fight ,YOU claimed Wlad was beaten to death .
"I feel to this day that had he been more patient and boxed, he would’ve won." R.Purity
Yet here you are TRYING to re write history claiming Purity battered him(he didnt even land any type of k.o punch ) and revision of some Purity dominance ,in fact Klitchkos trainer is the one who stopped it , which you already said so put the drugs away , You act as if Wlad who was also only 225 then was outmatchedyou would know this if you actually SAW the fight .
You truly are a special type of ******,when the *** did I ever say anything that even remotely implied that purrity was winning until the tko,I said klitscho got battered, which your revisionist post is trying to negate. Klitscho got his ****in head smashed in at the end of the 10th,was kd,then was battered in the 11th,a fight last 12 rds,only a moron would claim that winning a fight until late means you dominated. When your gassed out & then are taking haymakers to the dome, your eyes almost roll back & your trainer stops the fight,you are battered. Your the revisionist who's trying to somehow make it seem like purrity didnt batter klitscho, the fact that klitscho gassed out somehow matters then but vs joshua it supposedly means nothing despite him being 41 vs joshua. You can make up all the excuses in the world but purrity beat klitscho til his trainer was scared he would die,or he wouldn't stop it.
Yet here you are TRYING to re write history claiming Purity battered him(he didnt even land any type of k.o punch ) and revision of some Purity dominance ,in fact Klitchkos trainer is the one who stopped it , which you already said so put the drugs away , You act as if Wlad who was also only 225 then was outmatched ? you would know this if you actually SAW the fight ,YOU claimed Wlad was beaten to death .
"I feel to this day that had he been more patient and boxed, he would’ve won." R.Purity
Show me my exact qoutes that imply the ****** things your making up,show me where I ever said purrity dominated the fight,or was winning on points. I said he battered him,& only a clown would say he didnt at the end of the fight, klitscho had already taken some big shots & looked like he was gonna collapse for several rds,& did go down before tko,you can argue that he was just tired,but thats bs he was tired & scared of purritys power,& was dead on his feet since the 10th,& when he went down it was because he was scared of getting hit more,simple. After 9th he wanted no part of purritys power.
You truly are a special type of ******,when the *** did I ever say anything that even remotely implied that purrity was winning until the tko,I said klitscho got battered, which your revisionist post is trying to negate. Klitscho got his ****in head smashed in at the end of the 10th,was kd,then was battered in the 11th,a fight last 12 rds,only a moron would claim that winning a fight until late means you dominated. When your gassed out & then are taking haymakers to the dome, your eyes almost roll back & your trainer stops the fight,you are battered. Your the revisionist who's trying to somehow make it seem like purrity didnt batter klitscho, the fact that klitscho gassed out somehow matters then but vs joshua it supposedly means nothing despite him being 41 vs joshua. You can make up all the excuses in the world but purrity beat klitscho til his trainer was scared he would die,or he wouldn't stop it.
This is your quote below (one of many idiotic ones)
"guess ross purrity was a future hall of famer with his 13 losses at the time, since he beat klit when he was in his prime & undefeated. "
You even denied stating never mentioning prime yet the quote is right here for all to see ? What a fool you are .
"I feel to this day that had he been more patient and boxed, he would’ve won." R.Purity
I dont have to make anything up that subject belongs to YOU .
This is your quote below (one of many idiotic ones)
"guess ross purrity was a future hall of famer with his 13 losses at the time, since he beat klit when he was in his prime & undefeated. "
You even denied stating never mentioning prime yet the quote is right here for all to see ? What a fool you are .
"I feel to this day that had he been more patient and boxed, he would’ve won." R.Purity
I dont have to make anything up that subject belongs to YOU .
Context dumbass,have you heard of it. I ask you to show me proof where I said that purrity was winning going into late in the fight before turning it around.
Ftr I was referring to how hes 41 yrs old when he lost to joshua & they make it seem like that makes you a hall of famer while purrity beat him when he was undefeated & young. And yes I missed saying that,as I honestly didnt think some lil *** would nitpik looking for any lil thing. But while were on the subject yes he WAS IN HIS PRIME,he was undefeated & 23 yrs old, with 25 fights. But is that literally all you can find ***wad? I ask you to find my qoute of anything your azz implied. You are such a lil ***rider that your trying to skip over what this was all about to begin with: your azz is mad that I pointed out FACTS,so you resort to the lowest form of fanboism imaginable,trying to focus on some bs to nitpik about. Bottom line you claimed I didnt see the fight & that what im saying is untrue,but cant refute anything.
Context dumbass,have you heard of it. I ask you to show me proof where I said that purrity was winning going into late in the fight before turning it around.
Ftr I was referring to how hes 41 yrs old when he lost to joshua & they make it seem like that makes you a hall of famer while purrity beat him when he was undefeated & young. And yes I missed saying that,as I honestly didnt think some lil *** would nitpik looking for any lil thing. But while were on the subject yes he WAS IN HIS PRIME,he was undefeated & 23 yrs old, with 25 fights. But is that literally all you can find ***wad? I ask you to find my qoute of anything your gimp azz implied. You are such a lil ***rider that your trying to skip over what this was all about to begin with: your bltchazz is mad that I pointed out FACTS,so you resort to the lowest form of fanboism imaginable,trying to focus on some bs to nitpik about. Bottom line you claimed I didnt see the fight & that what im saying is untrue,but cant refute anything.
The only proof here is that your a fool . You TRIED to make b.s up like Klitchko was avoiding the world beater Purity ,in FACT Klitchko was visibly upset at the stoppage and wasnt knocked down with ANY punch the previous rnd ,,,,again this suggests you DIDNT watch the fight doesn't it ?
" Joshua is the biggest hypejob since gigi " ???? SMH
So a 22 year old Klitchko is in his prime now in 25 fights in ??? And without Steward ??? YDKSAB my friend !
"the fact was that he was undefeated when he fought purrity,& was battered half to death by a guy w/13 losses, "
The only proof here is that your a fool . You TRIED to make b.s up like Klitchko was avoiding the world beater Purity ,in FACT Klitchko was visibly upset at the stoppage and wasnt knocked down with ANY punch the previous rnd ,,,,again this suggests you DIDNT watch the fight doesn't it ?
So a 22 year old Klitchko is in his prime now in 25 fights in ??? And without Steward ??? YDKSAB my friend !
"the fact was that he was undefeated when he fought purrity,& was battered half to death by a guy w/13 losses,
Just listen to yourself you ***svcking ass bltch,your trying to claim that purrity didnt batter klitscho til his trainer stopped it in the 11th rd,& regardless if you claim that him being hit right before going down doesnt count,only a twat would claim that he didnt go down in the 10th because of that work purrity started giving him. He hit him flush 1 second before he went down. Its you who didn't see the fight gimp.
I know purrity is no world beater which was my point from the beginning you dumb twat. He had his brother rematch him 7 fights later for him,& whats this shlt about not being trained by Steward mattering,since when do trainers get in the ring?
You truly are a colossal imbecile,all youve done is nitpik irrelevant nonsense to somehow negate all the facts I said. You still have yet to do anything but cry & bltch that klitscho didn't already get battered 3x & had 4L when he fought joshua. Your only point has been that klitscho somehow didnt lose to purrity by tko & that it somehow doesn't count since klitscho got tired & was so scared he had already went down easy in 10th to avoid getting hit more.
Is there anyone reading this nonsense?
I guess you dont realize that purrity hits like a mack truck & klitscho wanted no parts & basically quit before his trainer jumped in,that counts as being battered.
Comment