Comments Thread For: Sanchez: Joshua-Klitschko Rematch Will Be Just as Good or Better

[boxz]

If it's as good as the first one then i'm on board Good stuff.

[Deus]

How am I hating dumdum,all I said is its rediculous how much their hyping him up,& who cares if wilders record is shlt too. Your just dlkriding because thats what fanbois like you do. Klitscho has been pounded into submission by a guy w 13 losses that he never wanted to rematch,then was pounded twice more into submission,then was beaten by fury 2 yrs ago in his last fight,& then got stopped prematurely by a bs uk ref when joshua had already been kd. Out of all of klitschos losses Joshua was the least impressive,I guess ross purrity was a future hall of famer with his 13 losses at the time, since he beat klit when he was in his prime & undefeated.
You did what fanbois do,get angry at the truth & offer no counter argument or rebuttal whatsoever.

I do somewhat agree that the hyping is a bit ridiculous, but you're doing exactly the same just the other way around...

To claim Klitschko was in his prime when he lost to Ross Purrity is just totally false. Klitschko's prime coincided with his 10 year unbeaten streak, not when he was a little more green and reckless (as in when he faced Purrity).

[kushking]

I do somewhat agree that the hyping is a bit ridiculous, but you're doing exactly the same just the other way around...

To claim Klitschko was in his prime when he lost to Ross Purrity is just totally false. Klitschko's prime coincided with his 10 year unbeaten streak, not when he was a little more green and reckless (as in when he faced Purrity).

I find this whole conversation crazy,considering I even wrote in my post that joshua looks like he MIGHT be the goods,I just cannot believe the hype he's getting for that win. And you can argue all you want,the fact was that he was undefeated when he fought purrity,& was battered half to death by a guy w/13 losses,whom finished w record of 31w & 20L,& then he was battered twice more & lost to fury in his last fight 2 yrs before joshua. And he had kd joshua & was still way in the fight when he was stopped prematurely,Uk refs stop fights way too early too often.

[kushking]

I do somewhat agree that the hyping is a bit ridiculous, but you're doing exactly the same just the other way around...

To claim Klitschko was in his prime when he lost to Ross Purrity is just totally false. Klitschko's prime coincided with his 10 year unbeaten streak, not when he was a little more green and reckless (as in when he faced Purrity).

Have you actually read the articles being written about Joshua & all the insane things their saying to hype him up. The UK papers are calling him the biggest star in boxing,this site regularly says the same,& their comparing his win to Alis wins over foreman, Frasier etc.,& comparing him to Ali. Theres so many people who hate on other fighters but are acting like Joshua has suddenly become p4p no1 because he barely won a fight he had no business making close. When someone has that level of hype & believes it,& says things regularly to agree despite still being largely unproven,that makes them a hypejob. I notice Joshua doesn't mention wilder,he constantly talks about fighting fury or parker,but rarely if ever has mentioned ortiz or wilder.

That said I think joshua can become great if he beats fury the lineal champ,& wilder hed be instantly p4p no1 in my book & many others. I said the same thing about gigi before he fought jacobs,that" if he ko'd jacobs with ease like the c levels hes been fighting then wed know for sure hes the real deal, that it was impossible to tell just how good he truly is until hes measured vs an elite in their prime fighter" & sure enough he proved hes not the killer the hype claimed.

[MDPopescu]

... The huge boxing show at the Wembley was what happened best to the sport as of lately... I'm not a fan of any of those guys, but in case they put up another big show, I'm fine...

[kushking]

I have a question for the klitscho/joshua fans why did klitscho not ever rematch Ross purrity after he was beaten half to death? If he wasn't in his prime supposedly,then why didn't he rematch him when nobody wanted to see his fights because everyone assumed his opponents had no chance,he could've rematched purrity at any time, but chose to fight nobodies instead who nobody thought had a chance. Youd think that it would be an instant ppv at the time as people would tune in to see the supposedly dominant hw champ fight the guy who destroyed him.

[Deus]

I find this whole conversation crazy,considering I even wrote in my post that joshua looks like he MIGHT be the goods,I just cannot believe the hype he's getting for that win. And you can argue all you want,the fact was that he was undefeated when he fought purrity,& was battered half to death by a guy w/13 losses,whom finished w record of 31w & 20L,& then he was battered twice more & lost to fury in his last fight 2 yrs before joshua. And he had kd joshua & was still way in the fight when he was stopped prematurely,Uk refs stop fights way too early too often.

All of what i've bolded there is indeed fact, but it isn't fact that Klitschko was in his prime when he got those losses, which is also what you claimed. Klitschko was in his prime when Steward tightened up his defence to the extent that he managed to stay unbeaten for 10 whole years. Klitschko was definitely not in his prime when he was 2 years into a professional boxing career. I really don't get how that could even ever be debated. That's not trying to take away Purrity's achievement in defeating Klitschko either, that's more to put some context to what is clearly negative spin regarding Joshua defeating Klitschko on your part.

I also don't agree that the Joshua v Klitschko fight was stopped prematurely considering Klitschko had already been dropped hard twice in that round, but neither one of us can prove either way so that point is just irrelevant.

[juggernaut666]

I have a question for the klitscho/joshua fans why did klitscho not ever rematch Ross purrity after he was beaten half to death? If he wasn't in his prime supposedly,then why didn't he rematch him when nobody wanted to see his fights because everyone assumed his opponents had no chance,he could've rematched purrity at any time, but chose to fight nobodies instead who nobody thought had a chance. Youd think that it would be an instant ppv at the time as people would tune in to see the supposedly dominant hw champ fight the guy who destroyed him.

You obviously never seen the ACTUAL full Purity fight ,everything you stated is nonsense and your gif shows not a single punch landed . It was actually Klitchko himself fallen from exhaustion !Next you will say Wlad avoided the Sanders rematch when Sanders gave up that match to fight Vitali!

[kushking]

You obviously never seen the ACTUAL full Purity fight ,everything you stated is nonsense and your gif shows not a single punch landed . It was actually Klitchko himself fallen from exhaustion !Next you will say Wlad avoided the Sanders rematch when Sanders gave up that match to fight Vitali!

Dumbass I seen the purrity fight,I know purity had rightfully been battered earlier in the fight,but came back & battered klitscho bashing his head in until he looked like he might die on his feet,his eyes almost rolled back. Dumbass stop with assumptions,if I was going to say that about sanders then I would have.
As I wrote in my previous post,why didnt he rematch him then,instead he let his brother beat him up for him 7 fights after. Vitali was far the better brother of the 2.
Its like your arguing for the sake of arguing.

[Eff Pandas]

Are they rematching or not? I keep hearing these lil feeler like stories out there, but never seeing anything concrete about them for sure fighting or not fighting.

Seems like its destined to go down again, but wtf with all the not so mystery mystery of it all right now. F#cking make a date or stfu.