Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Pulev Stands Firm on Getting Mandatory Crack at Anthony Joshua

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by kushking View Post
    Yes you ****ing casuals who dont know the difference from power punching ko artist like wilder & klitscho whos been a shell of himself for years,& wasnt able to kd many other nobodies but did joshua & almost kod him. Klitscho is no longer a power puncher nor has he been for years,****ing casual.
    Son, learn some history, Wlad is known for being one of the hardest punchers in HW history. Manny Steward said he was the hardest hitting HW he worked with, followed by Lennox.

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by Poppo168 View Post
      Son, learn some history, Wlad is known for being one of the hardest punchers in HW history. Manny Steward said he was the hardest hitting HW he worked with, followed by Lennox.
      Power is the LAST thing to go for a HW fighter this kushking (comedy king) doesnt even consider a trainer as important did you read all his garbage posts ,gotta be a troll or hes like the dumbest poster on here which would be a monumental achievement considering the bunch we can select from !

      Comment


      • #43
        Pulev stands firm.....

        well, Joshua/Klitschko is NEXT.....

        so, it looks like the IBF strap will get some much-needed bin-time

        Comment


        • #44
          It's like these governing bodies don't want the best fights being made. I get the whole mandatory challenger thing, but they should tell them they're going to strip them before rematch clauses get inserted into contracts. Or maybe they do? I don't know.
          Originally posted by juggernaut666 View Post
          Yep and the most logical post so far .^^^^^^^^^^^^

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by Travycat View Post
            It's like these governing bodies don't want the best fights being made. I get the whole mandatory challenger thing, but they should tell them they're going to strip them before rematch clauses get inserted into contracts. Or maybe they do? I don't know.


            the IBF have heard of the WBA, WBC, and WBO

            as-in, the IBF are well-aware that they exist

            the IBF have definitely heard of the following fighters.....
            Klitschko
            Wilder
            Fury

            the IBF can pretend that they are the best sanctioning body, but when they pretend that the WBA, WBC, WBO, Klitschko, Wilder, and Fury, don't exist..... they prove that they are not the best

            ordering Martin/Glazkov in favor of Fury/Klitschko, was insane

            now we will get Pulev/Jennings, or something

            they could at least cover-up the fact that their rankings are dreadful by having some common-sense

            Comment


            • #46
              It's all ego. They could wait a fight, and then enforce the mandatory for a potentially much better bout. But someone in that office is overcompensating for something.
              Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
              the IBF have heard of the WBA, WBC, and WBO

              as-in, the IBF are well-aware that they exist

              the IBF have definitely heard of the following fighters.....
              Klitschko
              Wilder
              Fury

              the IBF can pretend that they are the best sanctioning body, but when they pretend that the WBA, WBC, WBO, Klitschko, Wilder, and Fury, don't exist..... they prove that they are not the best

              ordering Martin/Glazkov in favor of Fury/Klitschko, was insane

              now we will get Pulev/Jennings, or something

              they could at least cover-up the fact that their rankings are dreadful by having some common-sense

              Comment

              Working...
              X
              TOP