Comments Thread For: WBC Prez Expects Golovkin To Stake Title, Despite Canelo's Beef

[original zero]

Stop you are wrong I posted you a link out the phuk boy WBC own mouth saying they were not creating a mandatory and they didn't for 2 phukinig years. Had nothing to do with Canelo not wanting to fight him chump.

it had everything to do with canelo not wanting to lose again. you can't expect the WBC to call canelo out publicly and say "we're delaying the mandatory because canelo is scared and he prefers a vacant title."

if canelo had asserted his rights, the fight would have been ordered. period.

[bigdunny1]

it had everything to do with canelo not wanting to lose again. you can't expect the WBC to call canelo out publicly and say "we're delaying the mandatory because canelo is scared and he prefers a vacant title."

if canelo had asserted his rights, the fight would have been ordered. period.

stop phuk boy if canelo didn't want to fight him again then by their rules they move down to the next ranked fighter and he becomes the mandatory. Floyd refused to fight Canelo at 154 the first time but you telling me had the WBC demanded a rematch at 154 he was just going to say sure ok? Floyd wasn't fighting ANYONE at 154 period. And the WBC had to release numerous statements on this fiasco and NEVER once said it was because of canelo. You pulling shyt out your azz. They broke their own rules to NEVER create a mandatory so that they didn't have to go through the akward situation of Floyd either vacating the belt or them being forced to strip him. So to get around him never making a mandatory defense they REFUSE to ever create one and enforce one allowing him to continue fighting for YEARS in welterweight fights while keeping a Jr Middleweight title. You are wrong take your L and sit the phuk down. WBC is corrupt and were being paid by Floyd and Haymon to look the other way.

[original zero]

if canelo didn't want to fight him again then by their rules they move down to the next ranked fighter and he becomes the mandatory.

wrong. that's the IBF you're thinking of. the WBC does allow the #1 to take their time if they so desire. the IBF skips right past you if you prefer to wait. the WBC does not.

canelo vs mayweather was considered a mandatory by the WBC, so when mayweather won, there was no mandatory. he had at least a year to make a mandatory defense, and when canelo wasn't in a rush to make a rematch, it bought mayweather another year. he did defend the superwelter title against maidana in the rematch, but had no mandatory because canelo didn't want to fight him.

[bigdunny1]

wrong. that's the IBF you're thinking of. the WBC does allow the #1 to take their time if they so desire. the IBF skips right past you if you prefer to wait. the WBC does not.

canelo vs mayweather was considered a mandatory by the WBC, so when mayweather won, there was no mandatory. he had at least a year to make a mandatory defense, and when canelo wasn't in a rush to make a rematch, it bought mayweather another year. he did defend the superwelter title against maidana in the rematch, but had no mandatory because canelo didn't want to fight him.

again take Haymon's dyck out your mouth you groupie the WBC spoke on this and never mentioned canelo you making shyt up. Canelo was never the mandatory stop just bold face lying and already I posted the article from Suilimam own mouth saying there was NO MANDATORY made a year later. The fiasco had nothing to do with canelo and everything to do with the corrupt WBC being in bed with Floyd and Haymon. They wanted a piece of Floyd fights so refused to enforce a mandatory broke everyone one of their rules letting a fighter fight exclusively in a different weight class for 2 years without stripping him or enforcing a single mandatory fight and laughably under major scrutiny sanctioned the Maidana rematch a fight contracted at welterweight. Thankfully Maidana didn't win or you would of had the embarassment of a fighter who's NEVER fought at Jr Middleweight and in a welterweight fight winning and becoming the Jr Middleweight champ of the world. SMH

you the lamest poster in this bytch with Haymon dyck so far down your throat with your nonsense essays about PBC and now trying to literally rewrite history somehow blaming Canelo for the crooked WBC who are in Haymon's pockets breaking every rule letting Floyd keep his hands on a belt for 2 years without A) fighting at Jr Middeweight and B) facing a single mandatory. you literally made up like 3 different lies and got exposed in all of them

[original zero]

the WBC spoke on this and never mentioned canelo

what was to be gained by calling out canelo for no reason? a year had gone by, canelo could have enforced his #1 ranking and he didn't want to. so mayweather had another year to do as he pleased.

no rules were broken. you clearly don't even know the WBC rules, which allow the WBC great latitude in these situations.

canelo was ranked #1. please show me one statement from canelo's team complaining that the mandatory wasn't being enforced? you can't because canelo wasn't in a rush to face floyd again.

how can mayweather be ducking the #1 ranked fighter when the #1 ranked fighter doesn't want to fight him?

[bigdunny1]

what was to be gained by calling out canelo for no reason? a year had gone by, canelo could have enforced his #1 ranking and he didn't want to. so mayweather had another year to do as he pleased.

no rules were broken. you clearly don't even know the WBC rules, which allow the WBC great latitude in these situations.

canelo was ranked #1. please show me one statement from canelo's team complaining that the mandatory wasn't being enforced? you can't because canelo wasn't in a rush to face floyd again.

how can mayweather be ducking the #1 ranked fighter when the #1 ranked fighter doesn't want to fight him?

what's gained by you gargling haymon's nuts and making up scenarios that never existed? But you still do it anyway. Floyd/Canelo was NEVER a mandatory the first time and he was NEVER the mandatory after the fight. Those are facts stop lying. And even if you want to rewrite history and say he would of been then they alert Canelo and if he declines they move on to the next fighter. The protocol isn't you just NEVER make a mandatory for 2 years you idiot that's against their own rules! WBC made it very clear they were not making a mandatory which is unprecedented breaking all their rules along with not enforcing that Floyd fights at 154 and never mentioned Canelo. You literally pulled that excuse for the entire fiasco out your azz hole. You keep trying to change the argument about rankings when I'm talking mandatory phuk face. WBC refused to create a mandatory and enforce their own rules allowing 1 man to hold belts at a weight he refused to fight at because they were paid off by haymon to do it. WBC is corrupt and you making up lies and excuses to cover for the blatant corruption. They ripped up their own protocols to continue getting paydays for Floyd fights. You literally lied 3 times and keep repeating the same lies. rock bottom was sanctioning a the Maidana rematch putting the 154 title on the line is not common nor is letting one fighter hold a 154 belt for 2 years while not making any 154 fights as he continues to fight exclusively at welterweight.


"It is an important historic event, because it gives recognition to a great champion like Mayweather. There are situations in which you should have that flexibility where you don't disrupt the development of fighters. There is currently no mandatory challenger at welterweight and super welterweight, no boxer is getting hurt [in this move]. His loyalty to the organization has been exemplary and this is also a way to show our loyalty to him," Sulaiman said.

No mention of Canelo phuk boy and hides behind the oh well there was no mandatory anyway...no shyt the WBC broke their rules refusing to create a mandatory in the first place.

[original zero]

what's gained by you gargling haymon's nuts and making up scenarios that never existed? But you still do it anyway.

I haven't brought up Haymon at all. You're the one obsessed with Haymon. I have never spoken to Al Haymon and I do not receive any compensation from Al Haymon. I do keep in touch with the WBC, but I do not receive any compensation from the WBC.

Floyd/Canelo was NEVER a mandatory the first time and he was NEVER the mandatory after the fight.

You're wrong. The WBC allowed Mayweather to count as Canelo's mandatory to reset the clock when Mayweather won.

When Canelo was them installed as Mayweather's #1 challenger, it was up to Canelo to force the issue. The WBC was not going to name Canelo as the official mandatory when Canelo didn't want the fight. It benefited all parties, Mayweather, Canelo and the WBC to leave Canelo at #1 without ordering the rematch.

Had Canelo wanted his rights enforced, they would have been. Canelo didn't want the fight, plain and simple.

[bigdunny1]

I haven't brought up Haymon at all. You're the one obsessed with Haymon. I have never spoken to Al Haymon and I do not receive any compensation from Al Haymon. I do keep in touch with the WBC, but I do not receive any compensation from the WBC.




You're wrong. The WBC allowed Mayweather to count as Canelo's mandatory to reset the clock when Mayweather won.

When Canelo was them installed as Mayweather's #1 challenger, it was up to Canelo to force the issue. The WBC was not going to name Canelo as the official mandatory when Canelo didn't want the fight. It benefited all parties, Mayweather, Canelo and the WBC to leave Canelo at #1 without ordering the rematch.

Had Canelo wanted his rights enforced, they would have been. Canelo didn't want the fight, plain and simple.

that's not how it works dip shyt and literally has never happened like this in the history of the sport. Canelo/Floyd was a unification fight at an agreed on catchweight not a mandatory they just allowed the fight which is normal and nobody has a beef with that. If after the fact they retroactive made it count as mandatory when he won the WBC title that night makes no sense but if they did that's just more WBC/Haymon corruption but show me a link because I've never heard of this.

But my point is after the fight the WBC creates a mandatory for the champ. You are literally making up a scenario/lie that they mandated canelo and he turned it down is why Floyd went 2 whole years without a mandatory when A they never mandated or asked Canelo if he wants a title shot against Floyd and if they did if he doesn't accept they move to the next fighter to mandated that didn't happen. We can go around and around with your fantasies or just listen to what the WBC said which directly refutes the bullshyt you type. They said there is NO MANDATORY which is against their rules made excuses about Floyd being loyal to them so that's why they created exceptions 1 to not create a mandatory let alone enforce he fight one and 2 allowed him a defense of the 154 title in welterweight fight and 3 to keep the belt as long as he did while refusing to fight at Jr Middleweight.

And of course you are the biggest known Haymon dyck rider on the planet and that's the only reason you are still arguing a fact of WBC corruption and making up bs excuses to defend Haymon paying the WBC to not strip floyd and letting his hold the 154 title for 2 years while he was fighting exclusively at 147. WBC never mentioned Canelo as a factor for why no mandatory was given to floyd and that issue was talked about and written for 2 years and nobody mentioned Canelo and you have zero quotes or links from the WBC that Canelo was mandatory and refused the fight. So again stop lying and while your at it take Haymon's dyck out your mouth you are making a mess everywhere.

http://wbcboxing.com/wbceng/news/6737-mandatory-challenger-rule-how-it-all-started

"These three examples led to the WBC implementation of the “mandatory challenger” rule. The rule basically gives the champion one year to fight any voluntary defenses against eligible ranked fighters and once every 12 months has the obligation to fight the mandatory challenger."

[kafkod]

GGG, his promoter his trainer all said they refuse to negotiate weight golden boy confirmed they were refusing to go down in weight so why the phuk you denying this happened you idiot when all parties have said it. You a clown saying golden boy didn't make an offer when you know the other side was doing interview after interview trying to force a purse bid and vacate because they refused to negotiate weight something loeffler said they would do in nov when canelo fought cotto and something the entire GGG camp said they would for for years 154 or 168 doe. Sanchez saying catch weights are terrible yet 6 months earlier he demanded one for ward? Bunch of fraud and bytches. lmao

Telling reporters you won't negotiate on weight for a mandatory title fight is not "forcing a purse bid" you fuckwit.

[original zero]

that's not how it works dip shyt and literally has never happened like this in the history of the sport.

hahaha you're such an idiot dude. the WBC has done that for years. if there's no mandatory already and there's a huge fight, they'll count it as a mandatory to reset the clock. over and over you prove that you either started following boxing yesterday, or never pay attention to what's really going on.

Canelo/Floyd was a unification fight at an agreed on catchweight not a mandatory they just allowed the fight which is normal and nobody has a beef with that.

and they counted it as a mandatory to reset the clock for the winner. the WBC rules clearly state the WBC can do whatever the **** they want whenever they want as long as they deem it in the best interest of boxing.

i'm sorry they don't call you about every decision that they make.