It would be fun if you explain how you think that comment of mine connects to this thread.
Like i said, for you it's practical to be analytical about another boxer's mgmt yet you doubt a K2 perspective as infallible... dude move on... try and be objective my sonn
Like i said, for you it's practical to be analytical about another boxer's mgmt yet you doubt a K2 perspective as infallible... dude move on... try and be objective my sonn
You can't doubt something as infallible .. that's an oxymoron, moron.
You can't doubt something as infallible .. that's an oxymoron, moron.
You never acknowledge the idea as K2 in protecting their star... therefore you approach K2 as infallible. You doubt it. I mean..you're still rocking chocolate brownies ffs...
Comment