Comments Thread For: Joshua Could Lose IBF Belt Prior To Klitschko II, Pulev Stands Firm

[juggernaut666]

The Joshua situatation is different they wont strip a champion whos trying to do the right thing..fury was a liar and just bad image for any santioning body.

[ShoulderRoll]

Joshua was a voluntary not a mandatory lol. Charles Martin called him out because he though AJ was a hype job and wanted to get paid. He offered to fight Parker as well but his camp turned it down while Hearn didn't.

The IBF system that allowed a vluntary defenses is why Joshua got a shot at the title.

Now because that same system is calling for a mandatory defense they want to drop the title.

[aboutfkntime]

The IBF system that allowed a vluntary defenses is why Joshua got a shot at the title.

Now because that same system is calling for a mandatory defense they want to drop the title.

he could have fought Dominic Wade for all they knew

how the fk could you possibly credit the IBF with that fluke ?

if Joshua couldn't draw flies, Martin would be fighting bums

[aboutfkntime]

how do you " rules doe " guys feel about the IBF breaking their own rules by granting Joshua/Klitschko an exception..... especially considering the Fury debacle?

Question:
did the IBF finally smarten up..... or did they display inconsistency following the Fury debacle?


take your time

[aboutfkntime]

rules doe, where you at..... ?

wut happened ?

[original zero]

how do you " rules doe " guys feel about the IBF breaking their own rules by granting Joshua/Klitschko an exception..... especially considering the Fury debacle?

They didn't break their rules. You're an idiot.

Question:
did the IBF finally smarten up..... or did they display inconsistency following the Fury debacle?

Neither. And it's hilarious that it took you TWO tries to figure out the difference between consistency and inconsistency. Did you think we wouldn't notice your other post?

Once Duva demanded a purse bid, an exception can't be filed.

Pulev's team prefers fighting Joshua to fighting for a vacant title, so they did not demand an immediate purse bid like Duva did (Duva preferred vacant title over fighting Fury), which allowed Hearn to file an exemption.

It's not our fault you don't know what words mean and it's not our fault you don't know how boxing works.

[aboutfkntime]

They didn't break their rules. You're an idiot.

Neither. And it's hilarious that it took you TWO tries to figure out the difference between consistency and inconsistency. Did you think we wouldn't notice your other post?

Once Duva demanded a purse bid, an exception can't be filed.

Pulev's team prefers fighting Joshua to fighting for a vacant title, so they did not demand an immediate purse bid like Duva did (Duva preferred vacant title over fighting Fury), which allowed Hearn to file an exemption.

It's not our fault you don't know what words mean and it's not our fault you don't know how boxing works.

what I know is this.....

..... you are a fkn idiot kid LMAO

[aboutfkntime]

rules doe.....

you made a right **** of yourself by spending DAYS arguing that Joshua should be stripped if he rematches Klitschko, as Pulev deserves his shot because "rules doe"..... but, now you.....

1) don't even think that bum can beat Takam

2) have completely changed your mind because "rules doe"

so, the IBF were capable of coming to a common-sense decision..... but, you had to ask them, officially

you on the hand, were officially asked to use some common-sense..... but, you refused HAHAHA

flip-flopping little twat LMAO

it is hilarious that the rules of a second-rate sanctioning body are more important to you than securing a top fight

[original zero]

what I know is this.....

..... you are a fkn idiot kid LMAO

You didn't address any of my points. You didn't address any of my points because the facts support my positions. So your only choice is to ignore everything I said and call me childish names.

Whereas I will point out what a ****ing ****** you are and then calmly explain why by countering all of your points.

Oh how I would love to be a kid, but sadly I am 34. It's my job to know the rules, so I know the rules. You don't like the rules, that's fine. But stop lying about them. You don't have to like something to be honest about it.

[aboutfkntime]

You didn't address any of my points. You didn't address any of my points because the facts support my positions. So your only choice is to ignore everything I said and call me childish names.

Whereas I will point out what a ****ing ****** you are and then calmly explain why by countering all of your points.

Oh how I would love to be a kid, but sadly I am 34. It's my job to know the rules, so I know the rules. You don't like the rules, that's fine. But stop lying about them. You don't have to like something to be honest about it.

you don't have any points

it is hilarious that the rules of a THIRD-RATE sanctioning body are more important to you than securing a top fight

don't forget that point, willya