Comments Thread For: Joshua Could Lose IBF Belt Prior To Klitschko II, Pulev Stands Firm

[aboutfkntime]

It's a pretty normal list as far as alphabet orgs are concerned. WBO for example is:
C: Parker
1. Hughie (yes Hughie) Fury
2. Hammer
3. Pulev

And I'm sure the others are as bad or worse.

IBF just sticks to its own imperfect rules a lil more than the other orgs but they're all subject to the fractured state of boxing.

that list is, TERRIBLE !!

you can call it whatever you like

try using the " others are just as bad " excuse on a judge

there is no reason why I should accept mediocrity, let alone ******ity

anally sticking to imperfect rules that end up with a ridiculous result, is exactly what I am complaining about

a decision made by a knowledgeable board, with the best interests of boxing in mind..... beats repeatedly following the same flawed rule and repeatedly ending up with a strictly second-rate champion

[aboutfkntime]

why are you ducking the question? what is your first language?

defend and support are totally different things.

if you said hitler ****d his sister and it wasnt true, i would point out that it wasnt true. that wouldnt mean i support hitler. thats not how words work.

they are not you fkn tard

you defended the IBF, AND you defended their version of "rules"..... on numerous occasions

you extolled their virtues on numerous occasions, and you have never addressed their obvious flaws..... not once

dumb casual fan who thinks boxing is a maths game

#rulesdoe

[original zero]

notice he ducked the question again...

[aboutfkntime]

notice he ducked the question again...

what, your childish little language question..... ?

is questioning someones grasp of the english language..... after they just owned you, IN ENGLISH..... as lame as being a grammar-****?

grow up kid

[original zero]

notice he still wont answer ...

[aboutfkntime]

notice he still wont answer ...

I will leave the irrelevant stuff to you

having already owned your casual-fan ass on numerous threads - IN ENGLISH - makes your silly childish excuse a moot point

my english going ok so far buddy ?

[Hatesrats]

Fugg the ORGS

[aboutfkntime]

notice he still wont answer ...

so, you defend an organisation that stripped the lineal heavyweight champ in favor of a second-rate bum..... and yet, you somehow think that the problem relates to my grasp of english..... ?




did you find your dentures ?

[iamboxing]

that list is, TERRIBLE !!

you can call it whatever you like

try using the " others are just as bad " excuse on a judge

there is no reason why I should accept mediocrity, let alone ******ity

anally sticking to imperfect rules that end up with a ridiculous result, is exactly what I am complaining about

a decision made by a knowledgeable board, with the best interests of boxing in mind..... beats repeatedly following the same flawed rule and repeatedly ending up with a strictly second-rate champion

love this, sums up exactly what most of us think...if not we should think the above, it makes sense on so many levels

[original zero]

about time keeps replying, but won't answer the question. hmmmmm .........