Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Is Groves a P4P fighter?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    I say he has proved to be in the top 20 p4p right now. He has improved a lot since his loses and showed he should be rated 1 at 165.

    Comment


    • #42
      He's underrated because of how vulnerable he looks. He always looks like he is one punch away from being out flat on his back.

      Comment


      • #43
        He's a good fighter for sure. I think he's been underrated down the years. He's only lost to top fighters in Froch and Jack. He was competitive in them too.

        This is a worn torn version of Groves also, he's done well to rebound from his loses. He's got another big fight on the horizon again now.

        Comment


        • #44
          i love all these guys that are like "froch is not better than DJ p4p".......quite a different tune about danny than the one these same guys were singing when the thought danny was ducking golovkin over money

          sorry...but froch>jacobs...its just a reality

          Comment


          • #45
            eubank was a guy who wasnt even elite at 160 and now groves is p4p for beating him? i thought 160 sucked according to a lot of people here.

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by Cutthroat View Post
              Wins over Degale, Chudinov, Gutnecht, Murray, Smith etc. his only defeats were really competitive bouts with Jack and Froch.


              I look at a guy like Golovkin's resume, and don't see anybody Groves couldn't beat. Jacobs isn't nearly as good as either Froch or Jack and he arguably won. I couldn't imagine 147lb Brook out boxing him either.
              if he had beat froch he would be for sure....

              Comment


              • #47
                I like Groves but P4P? Lol wtf
                He isnt that kind of fighter. Good fighter but not elite.

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by Curt Henning View Post
                  i love all these guys that are like "froch is not better than DJ p4p".......quite a different tune about danny than the one these same guys were singing when the thought danny was ducking golovkin over money

                  sorry...but froch>jacobs...its just a reality
                  Groves>Jacobs nevermind Froch.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by daggum View Post
                    eubank was a guy who wasnt even elite at 160 and now groves is p4p for beating him? i thought 160 sucked according to a lot of people here.
                    Who did Golovkin beat when he first entered the P4P list? He was high as #3 when his best win was Murray.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      P4P? Maybe top 30 or 40.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP