Will Spence want them problems? He did well yesterday. But I think it's clear that Terence is the better boxer of the two. And with Bud being able to switch up the angles, fight long and short, hit and move etc!!..I think Spence would be advised to get Thurman quickly and then move up to 154.
When Crawford moves up!!!
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
... Spence vs Crawford is a fight too far, tbh...When Crawford moves up!!!
Will Spence want them problems? He did well yesterday. But I think it's clear that Terence is the better boxer of the two. And with Bud being able to switch up the angles, fight long and short, hit and move etc!!..I think Spence would be advised to get Thurman quickly and then move up to 154.Comment
-
i dont think anyone can handle spence for 12.....i just dont see it...and i think crawford has proven to be a top 10 p4p guy without question...i think spence is the goods tho....spence is a different class than anyone crawford has beaten even though id say crawfords resume is better than spences at this point.....Comment
-
Yes Spence is good. But the question I have is can someone like Errol, who, let's be honest, is pretty straight forward in his approach. Outbox a guy who has so many dimensions like Crawford does? I mean on a technical level I give the advantage firmly to Crawford. Strength and power will no doubt lie with Spence. But as we saw in the Floyd/Canelo fight, that often isn't enough.i dont think anyone can handle spence for 12.....i just dont see it...and i think crawford has proven to be a top 10 p4p guy without question...i think spence is the goods tho....spence is a different class than anyone crawford has beaten even though id say crawfords resume is better than spences at this point.....Comment
-
i hear you....like i said...i think that guys are looking at what they saw last night and thinking spence aint a top level "boxer"....but as good as spence did you could tell he wasnt satisfied....he wasnt at his best and he knew itYes Spence is good. But the question I have is can someone like Errol, who, let's be honest, is pretty straight forward in his approach. Outbox a guy who has so many dimensions like Crawford does? I mean on a technical level I give the advantage firmly to Crawford. Strength and power will no doubt lie with Spence. But as we saw in the Floyd/Canelo fight, that often isn't enough.
but he had alot of things working against him..he was off 9 months...fighting in brooks backyard...and brook is awkward and does some unconventional stuff....i actually think spence might have an easier of a time against crawford than he did against brook as weird as that sounds....and as good as crawford is.....Comment
-
Canelo and floyd is a bad example because canelo was drained and weak and is not known as a come forward fightsr and doesnt know how to cut off the ring. Spence is in his prime knows how to cut off the ring and isnt drained against crawford if they ever fight.Yes Spence is good. But the question I have is can someone like Errol, who, let's be honest, is pretty straight forward in his approach. Outbox a guy who has so many dimensions like Crawford does? I mean on a technical level I give the advantage firmly to Crawford. Strength and power will no doubt lie with Spence. But as we saw in the Floyd/Canelo fight, that often isn't enough.Comment
-
ive seen much of your work and already know you are an idiot...but you are right, here, for the most part...cept for canelo was "drained"...thats complete rubbish youve made up......your hero is going to have more problems with canelo than floyd did and youve already set up your excuse as to why...lolComment
Comment