When Crawford moves up!!!

[j.razor]

Canelo and floyd is a bad example because canelo was drained and weak and is not known as a come forward fightsr and doesnt know how to cut off the ring. Spence is in his prime knows how to cut off the ring and isnt drained against crawford if they ever fight.

Canelo wasn't drained. So stop right there. Floyd was just too fast for him & Floyd hits harder the you think.....

[j.razor]

Will Spence want them problems? He did well yesterday. But I think it's clear that Terence is the better boxer of the two. And with Bud being able to switch up the angles, fight long and short, hit and move etc!!..I think Spence would be advised to get Thurman quickly and then move up to 154.

Bud is at 140 & I don't think he can beat Errol at this time. The weight right now is the factor.

[Silky-Flow]

Canelo and floyd is a bad example because canelo was drained and weak and is not known as a come forward fightsr and doesnt know how to cut off the ring. Spence is in his prime knows how to cut off the ring and isnt drained against crawford if they ever fight.

But Floyd backed him up for the first half of the fight though!!!. And the comparison was simply about the smaller man having the technical advantage, which Crawford would certainly have against Spence.

[Curt Henning]

But Floyd backed him up for the first half of the fight though!!!. And the comparison was simply about the smaller man having the technical advantage, which Crawford would certainly have against Spence.

having a technical advantage is nice....but is it so much of an advantage, in this case, that it can help crawford keep a guy like spence off him for 12?

i think spence is one of those guys that just cant be stopped from doing what he likes to do over 12.....if crawford can outbox him for 4-6 rounds is that going to help him win? im not sure...i mean brook wasnt looking too bad through 6 either....but it wasnt enough.....

and that spence jab wasnt too bad either...it set the tone early on that eye.....and that body work too man? wooo.....i dunno if crawford technical abilities are gonna stop spence from doing what he does over the full 12

[Thraxox]

But Floyd backed him up for the first half of the fight though!!!. And the comparison was simply about the smaller man having the technical advantage, which Crawford would certainly have against Spence.

Crawford maybe a snaller man but the size difference isnt of significance . Crawford is 5'8 1/2- 5'9 while spence is 5'9-5'9 1/2 both fighters rehydrate to the upper 50s or early 60s.

[Sheldon312]

SMH. We haven't even seen Crawford at 147 yet. Like I said before Crawford will be a slight under dog against some guys at147

[Metho_4u]

i would bet the ranch on spence beating crawford

You better start shack shopping.

[Curt Henning]

You better start shack shopping.

i make good money...plus i always land on my feet in any situation lol

anyways...i dont see it happening anytime soon so