This thread should be interesting. There are a number of people who will pick Crawford to beat FLoyd when he was prime. These same posters are picking 38 yr old Manny to beat Crawford or are not sure who would win if they'd fight. Which begs the question:
If you think current Crawford would've beat prime Floyd, knowing past it Floyd beat 36 yr old Manny, how can you think 38 yr old Manny would beat current Crawford?
"floyd never faced anyone like crawford" well who tf has crawford faced like floyd?? it'll be a great chess match. i give it to floyd on points. crawford needs to become undisputed though thats something floyd never achieved. i wish lomachenko was bigger so he can move up and fight crawford. that's my dream match right there. but since hes too small the next great fight is bud vs thurman. pacquiao is old bud will get no credit beating him.
Hmmm...Bud has surely impressed me. I see this fight going to a split desicion. Bud is special, just like Floyd. He seems more determined. I call this a pick'em...And that says alot about Crawford.
I'd pick Crawford. Floyd has never fought a guy like Crawford, I'm not even sure he'd take the fight - and that's not to say much about his counterpart, Manny, cause I don't think he'd take the fight either (maybe in his prime he would have). Crawford is a stylistic nightmare. I believe you have to have real advantages to beat him, size, strength, similar movement, great hand speed, reflexes...that boy is a problem.
...has crawford fought anyone in the stratosphere of a mid 20s floyd?
come on bro...thats a weak argument lol
floyd is clearly faster with his hands, reflexes, better inside fighter, counters etc.....
did you even watch floyd in his prime or you just watched the guy in his mid 30s lol
Comment