Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Team Uzcategui Will Push For No-Contest, Dirrell Rematch Order

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by future hendrixx View Post
    only thing dirrell won was an oscar nomination.
    Nah he has actually won the Oscars twice (Abraham and now Uzcatequi) which is more than Leonardo DiCaprio! Quite a feat no?

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by Ake-Dawg View Post
      By this logic, every fighter should wait until a second left in the round and fire off a 3 to 4 punch combo. It's not the referees job to adjudicate intent. If you hit a fighter low after a warning...you get a point deduction; intentional or not. It's unfortunate in this situation because the kid was coming on in that round and just needed 1 more tick on the clock.
      you couldnt be more wrong. It is ABSOLUTELY the referee's job to determine intent. That is why there are "intentional" fouls, and "unintentional" fouls, and its up to the referee to determine the violators intent.

      This was an unintentional foul, in the midst of a combo, and the ref should have given Dirrell 5 minutes to recover and the fight goes on. Dirrell was fine, and told the ref he was ok, and then his corner starts yelling "lay down lay down!!!" and he goes into one of those con jobs like when someone bumps into a stopped car and then falls down like they got hit at 80mph. It was absurd......

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post
        By all means press charges against Lawson for assault.

        But the DQ was deserved, he landed that punch after the bell and had already received a warning earlier for another punch that also landed late. Can't be fighting dirty like that.
        you crazy...he was throwing combination and the last punch was set to go out of instinct and practice at the heat of the moment, DQ was an overreaction...plus protect yourself at all times is common knowledge because of situations like that..GTFOH with that wimpy BS

        Comment


        • #14
          I really hope it's a no-contest.

          Comment


          • #15
            ****** ref lost control of his emotions. I think it should be a no contest myself. I've watched it over & over again and I've got to say it's so tight between the punch being landed and the bell sounding off.
            It was a legitimate KD even when I watched it real time, even Andre thought so.

            Comment


            • #16
              It was his 2nd warning for hitting late.

              The DQ was deserved.

              With y'all logic, a dude should just start throwing a 6 punch combo as the round is ending.

              You can't hit after the bell!

              This dude did it twice.

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by OnePunch View Post
                you couldnt be more wrong. It is ABSOLUTELY the referee's job to determine intent. That is why there are "intentional" fouls, and "unintentional" fouls, and its up to the referee to determine the violators intent.

                This was an unintentional foul, in the midst of a combo, and the ref should have given Dirrell 5 minutes to recover and the fight goes on. Dirrell was fine, and told the ref he was ok, and then his corner starts yelling "lay down lay down!!!" and he goes into one of those con jobs like when someone bumps into a stopped car and then falls down like they got hit at 80mph. It was absurd......
                Damn!!! Couldn't say it better my self. If the ref. thought it was that n ad he should of taken points off and let the DOCTORS do there JOB and look at Dirrell. I lost ALL respect for for this QUITTER/Flopper

                Comment


                • #18
                  the only logical way to handle this.....punish the lousy ref though.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Punch was at the bell and completely unintentional. The uncle should be arrested and the ref should be sanctioned for his incompetence.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      I have to say a N/C is about the fairest outcome all round.

                      Giving Dirrell the win is just an insult to be honest - the dude just cheated.

                      Pretty shabby affair all around, the referee was very shady IMO.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP