Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Thurman Beats Crawford Easily... stylistic nightmare

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Neither guy beats the other 'easily', no chance. I think this is a competitive fight and probably goes 12 rounds. Crawford really showed me something against Diaz, I've got to hold my hands up and say I underrated him, he's definitely a top 10 P4P fighter. Credit where it's due.

    With that said, you boys already know who I'm going with. Bud can get some whenever he's ready.

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by HeadShots View Post
      too fast. too powerful. too skilled.

      Porter would be a problem for Crawford too.

      Last saturday proved to me that Crawford is pillowfisted. he hit that Cuban midget with every punch in the book... full wind-up. hooks uppercuts. straights. never dropped him once.


      Thurman would UD Crawford 12-0 like how RJJ did Toney imo. huge difference in footspeed. Crawford walks around. Thurman hops around.

      crawford is faster than thurman

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by John Locke View Post
        Neither guy beats the other 'easily', no chance. I think this is a competitive fight and probably goes 12 rounds. Crawford really showed me something against Diaz, I've got to hold my hands up and say I underrated him, he's definitely a top 10 P4P fighter. Credit where it's due.

        With that said, you boys already know who I'm going with. Bud can get some whenever he's ready.
        I didn't see the Diaz fight yet but I would bet on Thurman right now.

        Comment


        • #44
          It's probably a boring fight where either one is afraid to throw anything. It's a waiting game for 12 rounds.

          Comment


          • #45
            all these people on here are underrating thurman. i dont understand it. see the americans hyping crawford and spence, but youve got a top level proven, entertaining welterweight but noone seems to be a fan? i dont care what people say, hes top 5 P4P for me, above crawford. being the top dog at 147 means a lot more than being top dog of that dog**** 140 division.

            Comment


            • #46
              Easily?? Hell no.. Crawford is pretty versatile but I'd favor Thurman to win by a late KO or UD..
              Thurman is elusive & counters well something even Crawford does really well..
              I'm a fan of both but One Time wins if they fight..

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by bigdramashow View Post
                all these people on here are underrating thurman. i dont understand it. see the americans hyping crawford and spence, but youve got a top level proven, entertaining welterweight but noone seems to be a fan? i dont care what people say, hes top 5 P4P for me, above crawford. being the top dog at 147 means a lot more than being top dog of that dog**** 140 division.
                you got 5 days, boy....

                Comment


                • #48
                  Idk, they're both pretty good. It would be interesting to see Crawford vs the top guys Thurman has beaten, DSG and Porter to gauge him a little bit better. I don't think either guy beats the other easily.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    The reason for these threads is because they don't want PAC vs Crawford to make noise

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      crawford would pick him apart. thurman fights like a better version of khan. throwing quick fast punches but with no real regard for defense or for accuracy while doing it. almost losing to garcia...not good.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP