Comments Thread For: Why Do Boxing Robberies Continue To Happen?

[ShoulderRoll]

99% of robberies benefit Black American fighters

95% of people like to pull statistics out of their ass.

[A.K]

There has only been one big robbery in recent times with ward getting the gift of gifts and we have a rematch for it, so it's not too bad.

[MONGOOSE66]

By Corey Erdman - If boxing is considered to be a form of physical art, then perhaps it stands to reason that the work of its artists are all too often misinterpreted and unappreciated. On Saturday, two high level boxing matches ended in robberies-that is, that when it came time for the judges to pick a winner...
[Click Here To Read More]

Because there are idiot uneducated judges and cause of greedy promoters.

[Canelo and GGG]

because judges are sometimes style fans.

that could be true

[Dle]

As I mentioned several times b4, allow the corners to score & rate the judges & ref. End of the high score official get the matchs while low score official(cheats) get booted out!

[Dle]

EZ solution, corners rate points to refs & judges. End of the day official with high rate score gets the bouts while low rate scores are booted out with no fights

[MantisToboggan]

Besides Kovalev's Ward Gift
Robbery, last time i heard of a crooked judges that CJ judge she is def paid and should be fined

[Wizardsh]

I said it once and I will say again their needs to be an appeal process where a fighter can have the fight re scored on tape and make it live, this isn't rocket science but many dip $h!ts don't want a fight to be re score but are quick to b!tcH about robbery.This should happen in at least champion ship fights

[Elroy The Great]

that could be true

aggressive guys are easy to like. robberies are rare but are so outrageous that they seem to be happening every other fight.

what isnt rare is that lone scorecard that makes a person wonder what fight was that judge watching. i can almost guarantee that judge favored the aggressive guy.

[KillaCamNZ]

Because the decision is left to three geriatric individuals with their own pre-conceived bias'.

Any time you put the decision in the hands of a trio, you're going to get weird results. Small sample sizes - in this case, 3 - create inconsistencies.

And this isn't even touching on the deliberate manipulation by Promoters.