Comments Thread For: N'Dam Upsets Murata, Wins Title by Controversial Split Decision
				
					Collapse
				
			
		
	- 
	
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
- 
	
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
 It's like Clottey, right?
 
 Too much covering upComment
- 
	
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
 Comment
- 
	
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
 After 12 rounds, I gave it by 2 points for Murata. You know what though? I can understand why judges could see it differently. Murata was simply way too inactive in many rounds. Yes clean punches are important, but so is activity and ring generalship.
 
 I basically had the rounds at 6 each, I gave Murata 2 10-8 rounds though, the 4th and 7th. I made the 7th a 10-8 simply because he had N'dam on wobbly legs nearly the entire round.
 
 Murata needs to let his hands go more. That Arthur Abraham technique bugs the hell out of me.Comment
- 
	
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
 I had it 116-111 for MurataAfter 12 rounds, I gave it by 2 points for Murata. You know what though? I can understand why judges could see it differently. Murata was simply way too inactive in many rounds. Yes clean punches are important, but so is activity and ring generalship.
 
 I basically had the rounds at 6 each, I gave Murata 2 10-8 rounds though, the 4th and 7th. I made the 7th a 10-8 simply because he had N'dam on wobbly legs nearly the entire round.
 
 Murata needs to let his hands go more. That Arthur Abraham technique bugs the hell out of me.Comment
- 
	
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
 I can understand that. So many rounds were close. I gave N'dam a couple rounds out of pure activity alone that could have gone to murata due to effective landed punches. I can also see why some judges would see it going the other way, although I find it very hard to say Ndam won that fight. Instead Murata should have let his hands go more. When he did he had N'dam reeling.Comment
- 
	
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
 Dude you seem upset maybe you need to wait a couple of minutes in the corner.Comment
- 
	
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
 Reading all comments on here I thought people were over-exaggerating so had to go and watch the fight.
 
 Some fights are close ones that could've gone either way like Kovalev vs Ward or GGG vs Jacobs but boooooy this one was a straight robbery and all the people that I've read cement my thoughts.
 
 116-111 for Murata with 2 swing rounds in my view and a "slip" that should've been ruled a knockdown because a punch touched N'Dam and the ropes stop him from falling down.
 
 Only the American judge had it right, and even on the comments from the video you can read french guys screaming robbery, there is no way N'dam won that fight most of all his punches were blocked by Murata's guard and Muratas blows were having significant results on N'Dam, yes this was a robbery and I do not use this word at all.
 
 Edit: For the record if someone is defending the veredict even Gilberto Mendoza (WBA President) is saying he was embarrased by those scorecards, go and look up his twitter, things got interesting.Last edited by batista84; 05-20-2017, 01:40 PM.Comment
- 
	
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
 word at some points in some rounds he was following ndam for almost a min no punching smhI can understand that. So many rounds were close. I gave N'dam a couple rounds out of pure activity alone that could have gone to murata due to effective landed punches. I can also see why some judges would see it going the other way, although I find it very hard to say Ndam won that fight. Instead Murata should have let his hands go more. When he did he had N'dam reeling.Comment
 
							
						
Comment