Is It Fair NSAC Denied A Pro Boxer A Career High Payday, But Allow Someon Pro Debut..

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • rickJen
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • May 2017
    • 8764
    • 822
    • 112
    • 118,371

    #51
    That's why this McConnor vs Mayweather should have never been approved in the first place.

    Comment

    • elfag
      Alpha fäggot
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Jan 2008
      • 15527
      • 3,465
      • 302
      • 65,929

      #52
      NSAC is just a state agency, they dont have the people and money to go up against conor and the ufc so they just approved the fight.

      They can shut down a nobody that ward was trying to fight without any attention, but lets be real, if they shut down conor, they would be hit with a lawsuit and endless media attention and they dont want to deal with that.

      Comment

      • The Time
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Mar 2010
        • 2604
        • 67
        • 39
        • 9,702

        #53
        Originally posted by !WAR CHAVEZ!
        Is it fair that NSAC denied a professional boxer his career high payday against Andre Ward (Rohan Murdock 19-1) citing a mismatch when Rohan Murdock is a active professional boxer with a record of 19-1 but turns around and allows someone to have a pro debut against arguably the best fighter of this era.

        So in NSAC eyes

        a professional boxer with a record of 19-1 with a 70% KO ratio is a mismtach for a boxer who is 31-0 with a 48% KO ratio

        but

        a Boxer who never boxed professional before and looking to make his pro debut so is 0-0-0 with a 0% KO ratio is not a mismatch to face a professionally boxer who has been boxer 20+ years with a record of 49-0 with a 53% KO ratio.

        WHERE IS THE FUCKING OVERSIGHT AT?


        I made the same point on another thread.

        There were complaints from some people about Cotto-Kamegai being for a World Title, which I agree that fight should not have a World Title on the line.

        But are okay with the NSAC sanctioning the Mayweather-McGregor fight. But to your point, an actual professional boxer was denied the opportunity to fight Ward because it was labeled a mismatch, but someone with no amateur or pro boxing experience gets sanctioned to fight Floyd.

        And we already know why these scenarios occured. It's all about the politics, all about the money, etc, etc...

        It's no surprise to me, it's been happening in boxing since the dawn of time. All of these scenarios should not be a surprise to anyone. Is it right, no it's not right. But no one should be surprised, it's been going on damn near since boxing was invented. Lol
        Last edited by The Time; 07-16-2017, 06:52 PM.

        Comment

        • .!WAR MIKEY!.
          Banned
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Aug 2015
          • 23780
          • 889
          • 769
          • 309,182

          #54
          Originally posted by el***
          NSAC is just a state agency, they dont have the people and money to go up against conor and the ufc so they just approved the fight.

          They can shut down a nobody that ward was trying to fight without any attention, but lets be real, if they shut down conor, they would be hit with a lawsuit and endless media attention and they dont want to deal with that.
          you theory about to get put to the test.

          Mayweather requesting 8oz gloves, bob bennet NSAC head chairmen says they gonna have a meeting.

          Im betting they approve it. as they should but if it was joe blow 1 vs joe blow 2 they will deny it without even thinking about it.

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP