Mikey Garcia vs Adrien Broner

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • therealpugilist
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • May 2012
    • 14612
    • 561
    • 4
    • 45,735

    #11
    Originally posted by FrankieClutch
    I would heavily favor Mikey in that. Broner is slowly turning into a gatekeeper
    ...he lost to two former welterweight champions and hasn't lost below 147.....how is that anything close to a gatekeeper?

    no prospects or no names have upset him yet

    only guy id favor to beat him below 147 in Bud...Mikey is my guy but people love to right Broner off because they don't "like" his personality....who cares...the kid can fight and people underrate the guy because of it.

    Comment

    • Kigali
      Banned
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Jun 2016
      • 17128
      • 263
      • 0
      • 19,441

      #12
      Originally posted by Ghost Rider
      Uh oh, the hoodrat got her panties in a bunch, .

      Says a greasy barrio dwelling chola

      Comment

      • therealpugilist
        Undisputed Champion
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • May 2012
        • 14612
        • 561
        • 4
        • 45,735

        #13
        Originally posted by Cuerno De Chivo
        at a catchweight 142 lbs
        I favor Broner

        he hasn't lost below 147.....Mikey hasn't had a lot of rounds the last few years


        Broner has only been dropped a couple times and has shown good recovery power, chin, etc. all by far bigger men than mikey.


        His issues come with pressure, not someone utilizing boxing skills

        Mikey is a lil stiff as far as head movement and can be timed

        I think Broner would win a close fight where his showy counters and harder shots, shine more than mikeys jab and attempts to outbox him.

        7-5 broner. could go either way though

        Comment

        • Kigali
          Banned
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Jun 2016
          • 17128
          • 263
          • 0
          • 19,441

          #14
          Originally posted by therealpugilist
          ...he lost to two former welterweight champions and hasn't lost below 147.....how is that anything close to a gatekeeper?

          no prospects or no names have upset him yet

          only guy id favor to beat him below 147 in Bud...Mikey is my guy but people love to right Broner off because they don't "like" his personality....who cares...the kid can fight and people underrate the guy because of it.
          It's a popularity contest to them.

          Comment

          • Ghost Rider
            Banned
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • Sep 2016
            • 704
            • 80
            • 5
            • 1,727

            #15
            Originally posted by Kigali
            Says a greasy barrio dwelling chola
            Don't go trippin' over your lips now, hoodrat.

            Wanna borrow some grease to rub on your fat chapped d**ksucking lips and your ashy ass knees and elbows? Put some in your dry ass hair too, .

            Comment

            • FrankieClutch
              OTSC
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • May 2009
              • 6084
              • 177
              • 396
              • 26,671

              #16
              Originally posted by therealpugilist
              ...he lost to two former welterweight champions and hasn't lost below 147.....how is that anything close to a gatekeeper?

              no prospects or no names have upset him yet

              only guy id favor to beat him below 147 in Bud...Mikey is my guy but people love to right Broner off because they don't "like" his personality....who cares...the kid can fight and people underrate the guy because of it.
              He should've lost to Granados. He went life and death with Emmanuel Taylor and Paulie. The books out on him. He doesn't let his hand go enough to win at the top level and if he can't hurt his opponent, they'll just keep throwing and win rounds by volume.

              I could care less about his personality. He's just not an A level fighter and would be beat by the top guys at 147 (Garcia, Thurman, Spence, Brook) and would surely lose to Crawford at 140

              Comment

              • FrankieClutch
                OTSC
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • May 2009
                • 6084
                • 177
                • 396
                • 26,671

                #17
                Originally posted by therealpugilist
                I favor Broner

                he hasn't lost below 147.....Mikey hasn't had a lot of rounds the last few years


                Broner has only been dropped a couple times and has shown good recovery power, chin, etc. all by far bigger men than mikey.


                His issues come with pressure, not someone utilizing boxing skills

                Mikey is a lil stiff as far as head movement and can be timed

                I think Broner would win a close fight where his showy counters and harder shots, shine more than mikeys jab and attempts to outbox him.

                7-5 broner. could go either way though
                He lost to Porter below 147. That was a catch weight of 144

                Comment

                • iamboxing
                  ******a facking game
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Dec 2016
                  • 6421
                  • 672
                  • 760
                  • 29,458

                  #18
                  Originally posted by redmish
                  No catchweights because they should be banned from boxing. This would have been a good fight 3 or 4 years ago when broner was at his perfect weight but Garcia would smash him now.
                  I agree. Catchweights should be a rare event when it's between two fighters everyone is eager to see, it shouldn't be a regular thing.

                  Comment

                  • therealpugilist
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • May 2012
                    • 14612
                    • 561
                    • 4
                    • 45,735

                    #19
                    Originally posted by Kigali
                    It's a popularity contest to them.
                    obviously....if there was a thread of Broner vs gARY Russell with a poll, Russell would win.....its pretty ridiculous...half the time they don't even give a reason or assessment why Broner would lose...they just want the guy to lose....

                    Comment

                    • therealpugilist
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • May 2012
                      • 14612
                      • 561
                      • 4
                      • 45,735

                      #20
                      Originally posted by iamboxing
                      I agree. Catchweights should be a rare event when it's between two fighters everyone is eager to see, it shouldn't be a regular thing.
                      catchweights have been a part of modern boxing over 100 years...this aint new folks...its BEEN a regular thing...just saying....

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP