"Fraud" and "exposed" is ridiculous. You don't dominate a division for 10 years unless you are very good. He addressed some early problems and became a dominant champ.
However, I do think he's been overrated. He dominated a weak division. And he resorted to cheating.
He's not a slam dunk HOF IMO. He gets in bc any decent HW champ gets in. I'd probably vote him in, based on his dominance of the division. But he's borderline HOF
I'm the last person to defend Klitschko but he's not a fraud and he didn't get exposed. He took a guy who would is younger, bigger, stronger, and faster than him into deep waters.
Now that we've had a chance to digest the happenings of this past weekend...
What would you say to the people who subscribe to this argument?
Klit was never any good...he was a product of his environment...he has been fighting bums for 15 years....the last two times he faced any legitimate decent HWs he got KTFO (Brewster) not to mention the Sanders debacle... and his first TKO loss to Ross Puritty ROSS ***N PURITTY...
Now he finally goes up vs another decent HW and he got another beatdown (although he almost pulled it off)
bottom line Klit was a bum who is no finally exposed...
What would you say to THAT dude???
Being a champion for 10 years doesn't count for squat in your book? This kind of statement makes you a "casual".
"Fraud" and "exposed" is ridiculous. You don't dominate a division for 10 years unless you are very good. He addressed some early problems and became a dominant champ.
However, I do think he's been overrated. He dominated a weak division. And he resorted to cheating.
He's not a slam dunk HOF IMO. He gets in bc any decent HW champ gets in. I'd probably vote him in, based on his dominance of the division. But he's borderline HOF
Comment