Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

AJ fans/Fury haters keep ****ing on about PEDS, but have no problem with Ortiz?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Good subject. People are so hypocritical about PEDs. Salido was a drug cheat but you never see it brought up now, even though Salido fans **** on about Mayweather IVs and such.

    When Ortiz got busted, I didn't know or care who he was. If he did it NOW, I'd be pissed. Mostly for ***ing up his career, just like I was pissed at Fury for bailing on the Wlad fight twice as a result of poor life choices he made. Just like I'm pissed at Povetkin for blowing his career with the PED use.
    To me, these guys are sports entertainers. If they use drugs I'm not going to be morally offended. What offends me is when they *** up my enjoyment of the sport.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by denium View Post
      Luis Ortiz is a proven (unlike Fury) roider. However i don't see the likes of MotorCityCobra crying about him getting an AJ shot?

      What gives? Could it be the blatant hypocrisy of Fury haters yet again?

      "Bbbbbut AJ fought a superior version of Klitschko" despite Klitschko being older & inactive.
      Soon as big fat Dyson Fury came off the roids the porker couldn't control his eating habits, all that Tren was burning those 20 happy meals a day.

      Comment


      • #33
        That's a valid point. Ortiz ought to be the subject of more criticism.But then again, he's not a common topic on the forums at all.

        Anyone know if he served a suspension and if he's been doing VADA testing?

        AJ, like other fighters, get the benefit of the doubt from me.
        Last edited by BrometheusBob.; 05-02-2017, 02:58 PM.

        Comment


        • #34
          I am not impressed by Ortiz anyway. In the last two fights, he looked bad to me. I think AJ KOs him.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by gmc_rfc_06 View Post
            Explain what you like, you'll defend Fury on anything.

            He had Nandrolone in his system, he's blaming it on 'eating wild boar' which confirms it happened. That's it.
            The evidence on Fury case will be examined by a team of experts and they will decide if he had nandrolone in his system and, if so, how it got there.

            Do you know what an expert is?

            Here's a clue ... you're not one.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by kafkod View Post
              MotorCityCobra went ballistic with "Fury is a PED cheat" threads and comments after AJ beat Wlad. This is the same guy who has been crying rivers on here about American fans not supporting their own fighters.

              So why did he suddenly become so desperate for Fury's win over Wlad to be discredited to make AJ's look better? AJ ain't American is he?

              I found out what was eating at MCCobra when I pulled him up about his anti Fury campaign.

              Ah, so MotorCityCobra is basically a racist. Figures...







              Motor City Cobra's "people" are black people, not Americans. AJ is black and Fury isn't. That's the only reason why these yank race warriors are suddenly getting fired up by a rivalry between 2 British HW's.

              They are the same team who suck off proven, self confessed steroid cheats like Roid Jones, Tony, Holyfield, Tyson, etc, as well as active guys like Ortiz, while condemming Fury, who has nothing but an unproven allegation against him, and GGG, who is tested 24/7 by VADA and has never failed a test in his career.
              Ah, so MotorCityCobra is basically a racist. Figures...

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by kafkod View Post
                The evidence on Fury case will be examined by a team of experts and they will decide if he had nandrolone in his system and, if so, how it got there.

                Do you know what an expert is?

                Here's a clue ... you're not one.
                Neither are you.

                "In response to public comments made by Tyson and Hughie Furys' representatives, UK Anti-Doping can confirm that both boxers were charged on 24 June 2016 with presence of a Prohibited Substance." - UKAD.

                Both Fury's had nandrolone in their system, but you'll of course look for a reason to brush it aside.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by gmc_rfc_06 View Post
                  Neither are you.

                  "In response to public comments made by Tyson and Hughie Furys' representatives, UK Anti-Doping can confirm that both boxers were charged on 24 June 2016 with presence of a Prohibited Substance." - UKAD.

                  Both Fury's had nandrolone in their system, but you'll of course look for a reason to brush it aside.
                  Do you have a problem reading what you just posted, or comprehending it?

                  Last time I'm going to try explaining this to you .. the Fury's have been charged with a PED offence, but they have not been found guilty of it because UKAD still haven't presented the evidence, if there is any, to a tribunal.

                  Ortiz wasn't just charged with an offence .. his case was heard by a tribunal and he was found to be guilty as charged.

                  You don't need to be an expert to spot the difference between those two situations. You just need the reading and comprehension skills of the average 10 year old child.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by kafkod View Post
                    Do you have a problem reading what you just posted, or comprehending it?

                    Last time I'm going to try explaining this to you .. the Fury's have been charged with a PED offence, but they have not been found guilty of it because UKAD still haven't presented the evidence, if there is any, to a tribunal.

                    Ortiz wasn't just charged with an offence .. his case was heard by a tribunal and he was found to be guilty as charged.

                    You don't need to be an expert to spot the difference between those two situations. You just need the reading and comprehension skills of the average 10 year old child.
                    You don't have to 'explain' anything.

                    Nobody is listening to the drivel of the Fury defenders.

                    Tyson Fury and his cousin Hughie are set to claim they failed drugs tests after eating vast amounts of contaminated offal

                    You don't need a 'contaminated meat caused failed test' excuse ready if there was no failed test.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by gmc_rfc_06 View Post
                      You don't have to 'explain' anything.

                      Nobody is listening to the drivel of the Fury defenders.

                      Tyson Fury and his cousin Hughie are set to claim they failed drugs tests after eating vast amounts of contaminated offal

                      You don't need a 'contaminated meat caused failed test' excuse ready if there was no failed test.
                      You refuse to listen because you hate the Fury family, so thus are completely biased. Until an independent panel find Tyson & Hughie guilty, they're innocent. That's how these things work, innocent until proven guilty. Kafkod must be getting sick to death of explaining this to fools like yourself.

                      Anyway, i remember you predicting Wlad to KO Fury with his first punch? How did that work out?
                      Last edited by removed; 05-03-2017, 05:48 AM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP