isnt it funny that the people who thought golovkin got a gift...

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Metho_4u
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Mar 2013
    • 7357
    • 211
    • 467
    • 18,920

    #41
    Biganalshow, when he saw his buttlover get lifted off the canvas by a WW

    [IMG]http://static.fjcdn.com/gifs/******+dives+into+frozen+lake_3d8506_5442148.gif[/IMG]

    Comment

    • Metho_4u
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Mar 2013
      • 7357
      • 211
      • 467
      • 18,920

      #42
      Biganalshow losing his mind before the Jacobs decision was made

      Comment

      • Metho_4u
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Mar 2013
        • 7357
        • 211
        • 467
        • 18,920

        #43
        Biganalshow at the mention of triple p's name

        Comment

        • satiev1
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Nov 2015
          • 4661
          • 575
          • 0
          • 78,492

          #44
          Originally posted by bigdramashow
          were the people who have been hating on him non stop for years. Im sure you were really objective when you watched the fight.

          Jacobs got dropped and outlanded in 9 rounds, but 'compubox dont matter doe'. Pretty sure he got wobbled a couple of times too, but 'robbery doe' 'GGGift'

          Jacobs made the fight awkward, sure. But just cause he was a tricky customer doesnt mean he won you ******s, you actually have to land solid shots.

          Its funny, cause whenever ward kovalev gets mentioned as a gift, you all get on the defensive and say 'what about golovkin jacobs' as if the two fights were a mirror image of each other.

          None of you wanted the fight when it came to the build up, were all playing it down. But youre now demanding he rematch jacobs, but you also compain saying his CV is thin? His CV's thin but you want him to fight someone hes already beat, which is what the vast majority of journalists agree with? what kind of ****ed up logic is that?

          Rather than just use ****** slogans and your usual hating bull****, can some of you please talk me through the legitimate case you have got for jacobs winning? I want a proper analysis of the scoring criteria you used for jacobs to win the fight. Did he outland him, did he visibly hurt golovkin, did he look the boss in there, was he setting the pace and forcing the action?

          And does visibly hurting someone repeatedly, dropping them, outlanding them for 9 rounds, pressing the action on the front foot, constitute a robbery?
          Jacobs got outlandd 3-1. Out jabbed 5-1. His head was snapping back every rd. No one gave credit to ggg's jabs which were landing. How do you win a fight being outlanded by 3-1? Jacobs barely landed any clean shots which is why ggg's face was fresh after the fight. Same old racists that said ward won the fight. No surprise.

          Comment

          • LetOutTheCage
            Undisputed Champion
            • Jul 2015
            • 4314
            • 163
            • 314
            • 47,581

            #45
            There's still people calling the GGG vs Jacobs fight a robbery. I dont know what these people are watching because it obviously not the same fight everybody else is watching.

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP