isnt it funny that the people who thought golovkin got a gift...

[boliodogs]

Why is a combination of lying, fake victim syndrome mixed with passive aggressive bigotry, and pure f@ggotry from ggg fans tolerated?

It's like bill o'reilly left fox for nsb.

Why would GGG fans need to lie or be victims?????? GGG won a UD as he deserved to. It's bigoted, f@ggy GGG haters who are crybabying, pissing and moaning that Jacobs got robbed!!!

[The Big Dunn]

Why would GGG fans need to lie or be victims?????? GGG won a UD as he deserved to. It's bigoted, f@ggy GGG haters who are crybabying, pissing and moaning that Jacobs got robbed!!!

Exactly, why? There was no need for this thread and if you had an ounce of decency you'd acknowledge this.

I and others disagree. But none of us made this thread so stop trying to equate the groups.

There is a very minute number of people claiming a robbery. Maybe they are doing so because of garbage threads like this.

[Larry the boss]

Yall love to use Press row right??? not one has GGG dominating and all had it close

ESPN 115-112 Golovkin
HBO 115-112 Golovkin
The Ring Magazine 115-112 Golovkin
The Guardian 115-112 Golovkin
International Business Times 115-112 Golovkin
LA Times 114-113 Golovkin
Boxing Scene 114-113 Golovkin
Associated Press 114-113 Golovkin
CBS 114-114
Telegraph 114-114
Yahoo 114-113 Jacobs
Box Nation 114-113 Jacobs
USA Today 115-113 Jacobs
Sporting News 115-112 Jacobs
MMA Mania 115-112 Jacobs
15Rounds.com 115-112 Jacobs

[Larry the boss]

i can name many many more journalists who scored it for golovkin, think doug fischer had it as wide as 116-111 golovkin in fact. i guess its coincidental though that every hater on here scored it for jacobs. you must all have the same criteria for scoring a fight, and i want to hear that criteria and justification for jacobs winnning...

ESPN 115-112 Golovkin
HBO 115-112 Golovkin
The Ring Magazine 115-112 Golovkin
The Guardian 115-112 Golovkin
International Business Times 115-112 Golovkin
LA Times 114-113 Golovkin
Boxing Scene 114-113 Golovkin
Associated Press 114-113 Golovkin
CBS 114-114
Telegraph 114-114
Yahoo 114-113 Jacobs
Box Nation 114-113 Jacobs
USA Today 115-113 Jacobs
Sporting News 115-112 Jacobs
MMA Mania 115-112 Jacobs
15Rounds.com 115-112 Jacobs

[The Big Dunn]

The punch counters are neutral. They just count punches and don't care how it turns out.They said GGG landed more punches than Jacobs in 9 of the 12 rounds while Jacobs out landed GGG in only rounds 7 and 10. They scored the same amount of punches in round 6. GGG closed the show by landing 31 punches to 15 landed punches for Jacobs in round 12. GGG threw 615 total punches and landed 231 total punches while Jacobs threw 541 total punches and landed 175 total punches. So GGG threw more punches,landed more punches, outscored Jacobs in 9 of the 12 rounds and scored the only knockdown of the fight. To anyone but a bias GGG hater that's a fairly close but clear win for GGG. It wasn't any closer than Thurman's win over Garcia and no immediate rematch is called for. The champ won and he is still the champ so the haters will have to deal with that. GGG doesn't have to score a KO to win just because that is the way he usually wins. Don't mistake Jacobs going the full 12 rounds with Jacobs deserving to win the fight. Jacobs clearly lost and the big majority agree he lost.

Why are you and other ggg fans so insecure about the win that you define anyone that has Jacobs winning a hater?

A number of independent, impartial, neutral people scoring the fight had Jacobs winning just as a number had ggg winning. The fan scoring had Jacobs winning. You seriously think the only people that downloaded the app and scored the fight all hate ggg?

[HarvardBlue]

on page 3 now and not had one answer to the question, what criteria did people use to have jacobs winning the fight in such dominant fashion that it was considered a gift decision?

I used my eyes.

[SkillspayBills]

I'm still at a loss why people keep trying to act like the two situations are the same.

Ward signed an immediate rematch clause when he signed up for the first fight. He got **** on for trying to get out of it. It's REALLY that easy.

They are the same. Close competitive fights that deserved rematches. Whether there was a rematch clause or not Ward SHOULD HAVE REMEATCHED KOVALEV. Only a hypocrite would call for Ward to rematch Kovalev but not hold GGG to the same standard

[Tony Trick-Pony]

were the people who have been hating on him non stop for years. Im sure you were really objective when you watched the fight.

Jacobs got dropped and outlanded in 9 rounds, but 'compubox dont matter doe'. Pretty sure he got wobbled a couple of times too, but 'robbery doe' 'GGGift'

Jacobs made the fight awkward, sure. But just cause he was a tricky customer doesnt mean he won you ******s, you actually have to land solid shots.

Its funny, cause whenever ward kovalev gets mentioned as a gift, you all get on the defensive and say 'what about golovkin jacobs' as if the two fights were a mirror image of each other.

None of you wanted the fight when it came to the build up, were all playing it down. But youre now demanding he rematch jacobs, but you also compain saying his CV is thin? His CV's thin but you want him to fight someone hes already beat, which is what the vast majority of journalists agree with? what kind of ****ed up logic is that?

Rather than just use ****** slogans and your usual hating bull****, can some of you please talk me through the legitimate case you have got for jacobs winning? I want a proper analysis of the scoring criteria you used for jacobs to win the fight. Did he outland him, did he visibly hurt golovkin, did he look the boss in there, was he setting the pace and forcing the action?

And does visibly hurting someone repeatedly, dropping them, outlanding them for 9 rounds, pressing the action on the front foot, constitute a robbery?

When you watch you landed the punches, GGG won with ease. His haters were just waiting for a close fight. If it were a Mayweather fight, they'd claim it was but close, but Floyd clearly won. BS.

[Metho_4u]

were the people who have been hating on him non stop for years. Im sure you were really objective when you watched the fight.

Jacobs got dropped and outlanded in 9 rounds, but 'compubox dont matter doe'. Pretty sure he got wobbled a couple of times too, but 'robbery doe' 'GGGift'

Jacobs made the fight awkward, sure. But just cause he was a tricky customer doesnt mean he won you ******s, you actually have to land solid shots.

Its funny, cause whenever ward kovalev gets mentioned as a gift, you all get on the defensive and say 'what about golovkin jacobs' as if the two fights were a mirror image of each other.

None of you wanted the fight when it came to the build up, were all playing it down. But youre now demanding he rematch jacobs, but you also compain saying his CV is thin? His CV's thin but you want him to fight someone hes already beat, which is what the vast majority of journalists agree with? what kind of ****ed up logic is that?

Rather than just use ****** slogans and your usual hating bull****, can some of you please talk me through the legitimate case you have got for jacobs winning? I want a proper analysis of the scoring criteria you used for jacobs to win the fight. Did he outland him, did he visibly hurt golovkin, did he look the boss in there, was he setting the pace and forcing the action?

And does visibly hurting someone repeatedly, dropping them, outlanding them for 9 rounds, pressing the action on the front foot, constitute a robbery?

Stfu, loser [IMG]http://static.fjcdn.com/gifs/******+fight+club_358a56_5472352.gif[/IMG]

[j0zef]

They are the same. Close competitive fights that deserved rematches. Whether there was a rematch clause or not Ward SHOULD HAVE REMEATCHED KOVALEV. Only a hypocrite would call for Ward to rematch Kovalev but not hold GGG to the same standard

To be clear, you're ignoring facts, repeating your opinion and not offer any arguments or facts to back up this opinion, and insult everyone else who does not share your opinion?

There have been thousands of close fights that someone can claim 'deserve rematches'. Doesn't mean it's true.

To top all of this off, please do note that Golovkin was interviewed after the fight and he said he would give Jacobs a rematch. Abel Sanchez went on record to also confirm they would give Jacobs a rematch, down the line (I believe 3-4 fights?) for business reasons - they want to rest up his injury, potentially have a fight with Canelo and then probably take care of a mandatory or two. Not doing any of those would result in forfeit of a big fight or one of the titles that Golovkin has worked hard for. It's a no brainer decision for any manager.

Thus you have one fighter and his team saying that they will voluntarily give an opponent a rematch, while the other fighter tried to get out of the contractually and legally obligatory rematch.

You can pretend somehow they're the same if it fits some sort of a fantasy narrative you've created in your head.