I would like to point out the double standard and seemingly obvious bias that the article in the current Ring magazine shows regarding Holyfield.
He is listed below people like Marciano and Frazier despite accomplishing MUCH more. Did anyone notice the massive hypocrisy in the criteria for being marked down in this list?
Apparently the writer thinks that Holyfield didn't punch as hard as Marciano or Dempsey, and he goes on to state that to be able to fight you need a punch. Yet Ali who is the lightest puncher on the list, is NO1! Does this mean that Mayweather jnr, Sugar Ray Leonard, Willie Pep and Pernell Whittaker are not as good as guys in their weight classes who could punch harder? Holyfield dropped Bowe with one punch, Dempsey swarmed, and Marciano clubbed old men. The list is b.s.
He is listed below people like Marciano and Frazier despite accomplishing MUCH more. Did anyone notice the massive hypocrisy in the criteria for being marked down in this list?
Apparently the writer thinks that Holyfield didn't punch as hard as Marciano or Dempsey, and he goes on to state that to be able to fight you need a punch. Yet Ali who is the lightest puncher on the list, is NO1! Does this mean that Mayweather jnr, Sugar Ray Leonard, Willie Pep and Pernell Whittaker are not as good as guys in their weight classes who could punch harder? Holyfield dropped Bowe with one punch, Dempsey swarmed, and Marciano clubbed old men. The list is b.s.
Comment