When done right boxing can be an art, sorry i post about him alot,but he is an artist

[satiev1]

Potshotting and winning a rd by landing 1 or 2 punches more than your opponent is not dominating.

[pasawayako]

Yeah floyd is an artist in running and hugging inside the ring.

But i will admit that floyd is an artist in masking peds.

[Shape up]

and who had he defeated?

Why would I bother going there, you only started watching boxing not long ago by your own admission, go watch Ray Robinson, he fought up to 20 times a year, could you imagine your precious little floyd fighting 10 times in a year, let alone 20, also consider they fought 15 rounds then, you definately need more perspective than you show now

[Shape up]

You may not think he's the greatest of all time (I think he's top 10 EVER) but he's the most skilled. I've seen him do things I've never seen another fighter do before or after. Watch Film studies on Floyd, **** will leave you in awe.

Lomachenko has better skills and fights in the pocket so much more than floyd did

[Scary]

Lomachenko has better skills and fights in the pocket so much more than floyd did

And then your credibility went out the roof.

[Robbie Barrett]

Mayweather is up there with the top ATG's like Ali and Robinson. Guys like Pacquiao are a step below, guy's like Lomacenko 2 steps and Golovkin a flight of stairs below.

[Fists_of_Fury]

Lomachenko has better skills and fights in the pocket so much more than floyd did

Lomachenko is a bum compared to Floyd. Lomachenko has more losing skills... lost to old shop worn Salido . What skilled pocket fighter loses to a 1 dimensional face first brawler that is way past it?!

[Scary]

Lomachenko is a bum compared to Floyd. Lomachenko has more losing skills... lost to old shop worn Salido . What skilled pocket fighter loses to a 1 dimensional face first brawler that is way past it?!

It's crazy how quickly some people will believe these extreme things. You watch one fight, against some B, A- competition and then you characterize the winning fighter as better than the greatest of the whole damn era. I mean, he is showing a lot of promise, but honestly, if showing up and looking good against regulars is a way for you to rank a fighter, then you should reconsider your own ranking game. (Not you.)

[Mike D]

Most elite, prolific defensive boxer in the history of the sport. Whether you loved him or hated him.

He made a lot of incredible fighters look completely lost and inept.

[The Big Dunn]

Well it's funny you should say that, floyds KO run was between 97-98, he didn't have a world title, he won a world title in his 18th fight so if he was so good as you all spruik about he really should have had a run of a lot more than 7 ko in a row, you all knock ggg but most of his have been in world title fights, so can you explain how you glorify Floyd but knock ggg

Those aren't real world title fights dude come on. It's also not against elite comp. as you move up and fight bigger men the ko's are less likely.

I don't mind that you celebrate the skill and talent of guys you like. It's just ridiculous to give them the same accolades as Floyd imo given who they did it against.

If the resumes were switched and I did what you are doing or if I have Spence the same credit as ggg you'd have a fit and call me biased.