Comments Thread For: Errol Spence: Jermell Charlo Provided Perfect Sparring for Brook

[SkillspayBills]

I don't care for points and don't know how to utilize the point system here!

How about a sig bet?

Spence loses and you have to have a sig that says, "Charles Martin is the GOAT Heavyweight" for 2 months!

Brook loses and you can pick the sig...deal!?

You're an evil evil man to make a bet like that lol

[bluepete]

Fuuucking Paulie Malignaggi? He stopped fuuucking Paulie Malignaggi? A junior weltwerweight? Big fuuucking deal. For your information, any fuuucking A level weltwerweight would stop Paulie freaking Malgnaggi. Can't believe you have the audacity to bring that up as an achievement. Paulie also been stopped by Danny Garcia at weltwerweight, and I'm certain even Berto would stop him at welterweight wtf is wrong with you? Paulie Malignaggi? Geez!

Your like a hysterical woman. Paulie always had a good chin, he proved that with Cotto, Hatton, Khan, Broner and Danny. What wrong with you. I said Porter is a solid puncher and you winge like a child. Paulie took alot from Danny, who I guess isn't a solid puncher either now your trying to pretend Paulie wasn't durable.Which is what I said. Didn't say he was Mike Tyson. And yeah Porter was hyped and seen as dangerous when Brook fought him. He's still good enough to give Thurman a tough one. So yeah, it proved Brooks mettle.

[bluepete]

So you can win with logic and you go with the emotional blackmail route? What are you, a woman?

Its pretty hard to talk logic to someone who thinks Paulie ain't durable, has no chin and gets flattened whoever he fights. Porter's win was seen as devastating at the time whether you like it or not. The point isn't whether Paulie is Mayweather, the point is has he always been durable. And he has. The point isn't whether Porter is Mike Tyson, the point is has he got respectable power. He backs up everyone he fights. He's hurt good fighters. He's better than anyone who's fought Spence. Golovkin hits hard, and Brook took good shots from him, didn't collapse like a deck of cards. He has toughness and a chin, fact. Bundu and Algeri haven't told us that about Spence. As for emotional blackmail, I ain't got a clue what your on about. If you mean me pointing out your trying to be tough on the internet then that's your own fault. I live and train in Peckham. You talk **** here you gotta back it up. Fighters get respected here, not called nothing ass and bum every five minutes. But these sites breathe jealously from men who wish they were good fighters.

[Sledgeweather17]

Your like a hysterical woman. Paulie always had a good chin, he proved that with Cotto, Hatton, Khan, Broner and Danny. What wrong with you. I said Porter is a solid puncher and you winge like a child. Paulie took alot from Danny, who I guess isn't a solid puncher either now your trying to pretend Paulie wasn't durable.Which is what I said. Didn't say he was Mike Tyson. And yeah Porter was hyped and seen as dangerous when Brook fought him. He's still good enough to give Thurman a tough one. So yeah, it proved Brooks mettle.

Not gonna take you seriously while you tryna convince me that a guy with a 56.6 percent KO rate is some monster power puncher. You try and stream that through your mind and tell me what you would think if I was the one tryna sell you that crap.

[j.razor]

Or that wobble against Larte is the shape of things to come.

You trippin. Let me remind you, its STRAP-SEASON....MAN DOWN! Peace.

[bluepete]

Not gonna take you seriously while you tryna convince me that a guy with a 56.6 percent KO rate is some monster power puncher. You try and stream that through your mind and tell me what you would think if I was the one tryna sell you that crap.

Point out where I said he was a monster puncher. I said he was a nightmare to fight. A solid puncher, who always gets respect. Golovkin was a monster puncher, especially for a welter to face, but the fact that he stopped Brook is sited as lack of evidence of a good chin. He was wobbled early, came back well, and stood there fighting a guy who's crushed much bigger men. The trouble is you can't be objective. I can see Spence is good. I can also see he's chins untested and he had a wobble early on that could be a clue of fragility. I also said it might just be one of them things. But if Spence wins I'll say he did well against a good fighter. If Brook wins, don't tell me, it'll be bad judges, early stoppage or Kells on steroids yeah?

[Kigali]

Point out where I said he was a monster puncher. I said he was a nightmare to fight. A solid puncher, who always gets respect. Golovkin was a monster puncher, especially for a welter to face, but the fact that he stopped Brook is sited as lack of evidence of a good chin. He was wobbled early, came back well, and stood there fighting a guy who's crushed much bigger men. The trouble is you can't be objective. I can see Spence is good. I can also see he's chins untested and he had a wobble early on that could be a clue of fragility. I also said it might just be one of them things. But if Spence wins I'll say he did well against a good fighter. If Brook wins, don't tell me, it'll be bad judges, early stoppage or Kells on steroids yeah?

That logic doesn't bode well for Brook.

We've seen him wobble more than once.

[bluepete]

That logic doesn't bode well for Brook.

We've seen him wobble more than once.

Yeah he's wobbled but since that he's proven he can take abit, particularly against Golovkin. He was hurt early and still got back in the fight. Errol hasn't showed a chin because nobody has hit him at world level. So it's a question mark.

[niceyboo3]

I don't care for points and don't know how to utilize the point system here!

How about a sig bet?

Spence loses and you have to have a sig that says, "Charles Martin is the GOAT Heavyweight" for 2 months!

Brook loses and you can pick the sig...deal!?

Charles Martin? Nah i'm cool