If GGG doesn't get the Canelo fight he needs to fight Jacobs. Bottom line

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Motorcity Cobra
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Mar 2016
    • 32565
    • 1,106
    • 545
    • 963,610

    #1

    If GGG doesn't get the Canelo fight he needs to fight Jacobs. Bottom line

    No sense in defending the IBF madatory. The only reason he was holding onto that belt was because he claimed he wanted to unify the division. Now that we know that isn't true he needs to run that fight back with Jacobs. After the Jacobs fight everybody was cool with him fighting BJS for the unification, then Canelo, and then Jacobs. Now that he doesn't want to unify and become undisputed it's time to stop defending the belts like the IBF. He can still break Hopkins record by defending the WBC and WBA.
    9
    Drop the IBF and give Jacobs a rematch
    66.67%
    6
    T. Johnson IBF mandatory
    33.33%
    3
  • Sup
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Feb 2015
    • 3463
    • 177
    • 107
    • 12,033

    #2
    I agree, wouldn't mind a rematch at all.

    Comment

    • danceswithfire
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jun 2012
      • 3590
      • 276
      • 394
      • 24,641

      #3
      canelita, saunders or jacobs in that order...

      if canelita b1tches out again and saunders bluffs again like he always does then jacobs rematch it is...

      you are too transparent ts

      Comment

      • Motorcity Cobra
        Banned
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Mar 2016
        • 32565
        • 1,106
        • 545
        • 963,610

        #4
        Originally posted by Sup
        I agree, wouldn't mind a rematch at all.
        The whole point of defending that IBF mandatory against people like Wade was so he could get all 4 belts. Now that he doesn't want all 4 belts it's time to drop that belt and stop fighting those weak mandatory's. The IBF MW doesn't have a Spence type fighter in their rankings.

        Comment

        • Sup
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Feb 2015
          • 3463
          • 177
          • 107
          • 12,033

          #5
          Originally posted by Motorcity Cobra
          The whole point of defending that IBF mandatory against people like Wade was so he could get all 4 belts. Now that he doesn't want all 4 belts it's time to drop that belt and stop fighting those weak mandatory's. The IBF MW doesn't have a Spence type fighter in their rankings.
          Plus if he can't land Canelo, Jacobs is where he'll get the biggest payday.

          Comment

          • Motorcity Cobra
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Mar 2016
            • 32565
            • 1,106
            • 545
            • 963,610

            #6
            Originally posted by danceswithfire
            canelita, saunders or jacobs in that order...

            if canelita b1tches out again and saunders bluffs again like he always does then jacobs rematch it is...

            you are too transparent ts
            Why are you mentioning Canelo when the title clearly states if he doesn't get Canelo the next fight? You're too transparent not wanting to see him fight Jacobs again

            Comment

            • Derranged
              Banned
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Oct 2005
              • 46593
              • 2,126
              • 1,350
              • 162,628

              #7
              Fuck it why not....

              Comment

              • Motorcity Cobra
                Banned
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Mar 2016
                • 32565
                • 1,106
                • 545
                • 963,610

                #8
                Originally posted by Derranged
                Fuck it why not....
                Jacobs deserves a rematch. GGG said no to the Saunders fight. If he doesn't get Canelo then he needs to fight Jacobs and nobody else

                Comment

                • danceswithfire
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Jun 2012
                  • 3590
                  • 276
                  • 394
                  • 24,641

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Motorcity Cobra
                  Why are you mentioning Canelo when the title clearly states if he doesn't get Canelo the next fight? You're too transparent not wanting to see him fight Jacobs again
                  why?...isn't it obvious that the fight that needs to happen is canelita vs GGG?...

                  Comment

                  • Motorcity Cobra
                    Banned
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Mar 2016
                    • 32565
                    • 1,106
                    • 545
                    • 963,610

                    #10
                    Originally posted by danceswithfire
                    why?...isn't it obvious that the fight that needs to happen is canelita vs GGG?...
                    Once again, and imma scream so you understand what I'm saying

                    IF GGG DOESN'T GET THE FIGHT WITH CANELO NEXT

                    Comprende?

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP