Originally posted by techliam
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Why don't boxers follow brooks approach vs porter?
Collapse
-
Originally posted by jmrf4435 View PostAll brook did was shift lateraly the entire fight and throw the jab and straight right...He had the size advantage but that strategy seemed to throw Porter off completely.
Why try and engage with such a dirty fighter? For example, I think Thurman could win every single round if he would just box and move, land power shots when they are wide open.
Comment
-
cause its easier said than done. and brook v porter was a clsoe fight still. remember there were a few media scorecards for porter, i had it very close.
Comment
-
Brook is strong as **** at 147.
That's the first time Porter grabbed someone, tried to push him to the ropes and couldn't budge him. Brook was stronger than him which nullified his dirty 'inside fighting' and left him with nothing.
Nullify him inside, box his ears off outside. I had that fight 117-111 Brook, Porter landed nothing.
Comment
-
Yeah why can't everyone do it like Brook?
Boxing is so easy...................when you've never been in a ring with gloves on with..................Porter? hahahahaha...
Should be as great as Sugarman in about 5 weeks!!
Ray
Comment
-
Brook should have been penalized for holding.
A lot.
To Thurman's credit, he made things with Porter a lot more exciting while beating Shawn much more decisively.
Berto's biggest mistake is not staying in the middle of the ring.
You know you are getting into a wrestling match with Porter but you should never willingly back into the ropes.
But, Berto had no legs...
Comment
Comment