I've been thinking about it, for about 70+ years of boxing history, fighters had been consistently ripped off by promoters/ managers. Al Haymon comes along and single-handidly transforms the game, so that even old promoters have to pay their fighters properly.
You'd think if the sport didn't have such cannibalistic fans, this would be hailed as a pretty remarkable legacy, even if you had other criticisms of him. Instead, all some fans and writers say about him is that he allows fighter to get paid too much.
But as a change from the last 70 years, isn't that overall a pretty great thing? Shouldn't some of his positive contributions be mentioned alongside the bad?
You'd think if the sport didn't have such cannibalistic fans, this would be hailed as a pretty remarkable legacy, even if you had other criticisms of him. Instead, all some fans and writers say about him is that he allows fighter to get paid too much.
But as a change from the last 70 years, isn't that overall a pretty great thing? Shouldn't some of his positive contributions be mentioned alongside the bad?
Comment