Comments Thread For: Julius Indongo Dominates Ricky Burns To Unify WBA, IBF, IBO Belts

[NEETzsche]

Darn fellas!
Can can Indongo be afforded at least one gimmee fight before he is thrown in with the Crawfords of this world?

Guy just won 2 fights back to back he was supposed to lose away from home!!

Heck let him take a well deserved break.

With Lipinets and Barthelemy gunning for him it's probably better to just go straight to unification. Crawford is the best pay day he's gonna get

[Citizen Koba]

Dude reminds me of a clumsy Paul Williams without the infighting.

[NaijaD]

read the damn comments. people saying how impressive indongo was. after i wrote my comment someone did a thread saying about what a great match up it is. the guy was swinging his punches so wide he was like a bird flapping before take off, and he was tripping over his damn feet, if he fought thurman at 147 hed get his head taken clean off, so thats why he fights at 140 even with his massive frame. you guys for some reason just keep hyping up these garbage fighters at 140 as legit opponents. people saying diaz is a really good opponent, the guy who peterson beat? Cause thats the standard of these fighters, B level welters can beat them. 140 has always been the same throughout history, its for fighters to hide at cause they dont fancy 147. garcia was running the show at 140, ricky hatton , adrien broner. all these guys, indongo, diaz, burns would get smashed to pieces by the top welters, cause thats a real division with real fighters. sorry if that offends people but its the damn truth, if i had my way i'd get rid of 140 altogether cause its a big pile of ****, always has been and it always will be.

Who made what thread???

Link to said thread hyping up Indongo vs Crawford??

Do you have some proof for once??

[sir ronni james]

who is that judge giving burns four rounds??? was he away for a beer some time or already drunken??? shame on him

[Madison Boxing]

Who made what thread???

Link to said thread hyping up Indongo vs Crawford??

Do you have some proof for once??

https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...d.php?t=742893 and read some of the comments. you even commented in it yourself. got people saying its a great test, you saying its a 'worthwhile fight', someone saying indongo was 'fantastic', 'impressed with indongo', 'crawfords biggest threat lets get it on' 'talented young cat' 'defensive footwork is seamless'. as if beating shot ricky burns makes you a great opponent for crawford. you havent got the balls to say it how it is, that indongo looked alright against some washed up B/C level fighter with no power. im not as naive as you all are, i know you are shaping it up so when crawford beats him you can chalk indongo down as a really good win. tbh im fed up with you and the rest of your gang. every time i say something you just go 'source' as if i have the time to go around dragging up comments and quoting them. ive done it here as a one off but im not doing it again, especially after work when ive got better things to do. you all pretend that this site is amazing full of brilliant credible honest posters and that theres no agendas, that the people who hate golovkin legitimately have reasons too, that noone purposely hypes up the americans, the worst one is when you start denying that the spence hype exists 'noones hyping him, source please, your making it up'. im done with you and your cronies.

[Nightfall]

hard work pays off. congrads

[NaijaD]

https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...d.php?t=742893 and read some of the comments. you even commented in it yourself. got people saying its a great test, you saying its a 'worthwhile fight', someone saying indongo was 'fantastic', 'impressed with indongo', 'crawfords biggest threat lets get it on' 'talented young cat' 'defensive footwork is seamless'. as if beating shot ricky burns makes you a great opponent for crawford. you havent got the balls to say it how it is, that indongo looked alright against some washed up B/C level fighter with no power. im not as naive as you all are, i know you are shaping it up so when crawford beats him you can chalk indongo down as a really good win. tbh im fed up with you and the rest of your gang. every time i say something you just go 'source' as if i have the time to go around dragging up comments and quoting them. ive done it here as a one off but im not doing it again, especially after work when ive got better things to do. you all pretend that this site is amazing full of brilliant credible honest posters and that theres no agendas, that the people who hate golovkin legitimately have reasons too, that noone purposely hypes up the americans, the worst one is when you start denying that the spence hype exists 'noones hyping him, source please, your making it up'. im done with you and your cronies.

loooool you are mentally challenged!!!

The first page of that thread is filled with guys basically saying he has no chance. As usual you're blind to whatever doesn't suit your agenda.

You take one post and ignore the other 99% that doesn't support your point. You're one of the ****test posters on here so please feel free to pack up and leave whenever you want if you feel you're too fair and unbiased to post here. I don't think anyone will miss you, your flip flopping and your pointless threads.

[soul_survivor]

Broner can't make 140 any more, can he? Let him get fed to somebody in Haymon's stable at 147.

What did he fight at last? 144. Either way I just want him gone lol

Khan v broner would be great @ 147

[steeve steel]

116-112 !!! Even the judge scared to death of scottish scalies and paid off by Hearn couldn't help the fixter. Bye bye Ricky Burned! (Boxrec should fix his stats: he actually has 10 defeats now.)

[steeve steel]

Dude reminds me of a clumsy Paul Williams without the infighting.

That's actually not a bad assessment. Williams with more groove.