Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Mayweather vs. Lomachenko - Head to Head Stat Comparison

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    out of these 2, who is the undefeated one?

    Comment


    • #12
      I think this is based around trying to prove fighters you like are better or going to be better than Floyd. If you already believe that Lomachenko is heads above Floyd's career, then so be it.

      I wouldn't even say being undefeated is the biggest factor. There are many greats highly regarded more than Floyd who have lost. It's about who they lost to, when they lost, etc. Loma has a loss, but he could potentially be greater over the next 10+ years. However so far, he has good wins vs Walters and Russell, but a loss to Salido.

      Lomachenko is 29 and as far as I am concerned has many years left to prove that or disprove that. As for now though, I personally can't vouch for him as a HOFer like some of you seem to.
      Last edited by TyrantT316; 04-12-2017, 09:21 AM.

      Comment


      • #13
        That's bogus anyways, it was proven that while he undeniably lost, Pacquiao out landed Floyd in their fight.

        Comment


        • #14
          Everyone does realize this was taken when Mayweather had 15 pro fights right?

          Comment


          • #15
            Lomachenko should just stop fighting right now and head to HOF. Why not just do a comparison with Duran, Whitaker, Chavez Sr, and Pacquiao and call it a day?

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by mantistoboggan View Post
              mayweather is the man, but he never dominated guys like lomachenko does. Never!!!!! Loma trully is above floyd skillswise. In amateurs loma is a king no one ever had an amateur career like him not ali not mayweather. This ukrainian is special.
              floyd dominated corrales, gatti, mosley, canelo and many other lmfao... Wake up casual

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by luilun View Post
                lomachenko is better he doesn't hold for one doesn't cry about gloves, doesn't get gift decisions 2 floyd received and lastly lomachenko won a world title in his 2nd fight
                your casual ass must have missed the first 40 fights of floyds career... Typical casual ******

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by luilun View Post
                  only baldimor
                  um coralles, gatti, mosley and canelo and many others casual bum

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by chrisjs View Post
                    true. There's not way lomachenko will lost to a guy like castillo in his prime, like 5-6 years into his career.

                    Also loma doesn't take illegal iv's..
                    loma wont lose to castillo but lost to a old ass uber driver like salido hahahaha... Typical casual ****** spewing garbage

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by shakedaddy View Post
                      never?? Did you watch the manfredy fight? The corrales fight? The chicanito fight? These were fights many expected floyd to lose, (especially chicanito and corrales) yet he dominated and destroyed. These guys were no sosa, salido, or rocky freaking martinez. And i don't even like floyd.
                      floyd is black to expect this hate.... They only care about floyds last 5 fights not floyds first 40 fights... These casual liars have no shame

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP