He has one great win over Donaire, (who funnily enough is called a hype job by Rigo diehards) and this was seemingly enough to have him in the top five pound for pound indefinitely. He's been in these mythical p4p rankings for years despite a string of mediocre wins against meh opponents. Meanwhile Lomachenko has completely destroyed world class opponents such as Russell Jr and Walters, not just beat but utterly decimated.
And these same people say he doesn't deserve to be ranked p4p?? Yet they had Rigo in their top 5 p4p for what reason exactly? One great win and passing the "eye test"
.
And these same people say he doesn't deserve to be ranked p4p?? Yet they had Rigo in their top 5 p4p for what reason exactly? One great win and passing the "eye test"
.

Comment