Originally posted by Butch.McRae
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Lomachenko Manager: Forget Crawford Fight; It 'Would Be Suicide'
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by hitking View PostI've followed this game for a long time. And from what I've observed, in order be successful against bigger foes, a guy has to have something extraordinary in his game that he can lean on. For Floyd, it was his defense. For Manny, it was the ability to carry his speed and power with him throughout the divisions. For Roy Jones, it was his superhuman speed and reflexes for a guy his size. For Sweet Pea, it was his defense and reflexes. And the list goes on and on. And I think Lomachenko's defense and footwork could keep him clean against bigger guys. The only thing that may get Lomachenko in trouble is his temperament. Lomachenko likes to let those hands go in 4,5,6 punch combinations. He would definitely need to cut that back to throwing one or two at a time and then get outta there as moves up the scale. But I think he could have success against bigger guys. He's just that dynamic.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Butch.McRae View PostI agree that his feet could be key. He moves beautifully
Comment
-
Crawford is a legit 147 welterweight... fighting against smaller guys than himself currently. Lomachenko is indeed too small for him.
I'm a fan of both. Mikey Garcia is somehow in between, and potentially could fight either guy.Last edited by Strategic1; 04-09-2017, 07:57 PM.
Comment
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by A.K View PostThey lie about his height I seen him in person he's almost 6 feet
Comment
-
What am I missing? Why is Loma the only one obligated to move up? Ten pounds difference, not to mention the height and reach advantage. Of course it's a mismatch. Why is this even brought up? Another ****** media guy must have asked another ****** question, eh?
Comment
-
Originally posted by JoeMan View PostWhat am I missing? Why is Loma the only one obligated to move up? Ten pounds difference, not to mention the height and reach advantage. Of course it's a mismatch. Why is this even brought up? Another ****** media guy must have asked another ****** question, eh?
Comment
-
Comment