Comments Thread For: Vasyl Lomachenko Punishes and Stops Jason Sosa

[yngwie]

Hey tell me how AWESONE Jason Sosa was??? Hype him up homey??? Tell me he's ALI, Mosley, Tyson, ALL rolled up in 1???

Come on HOMEY??? Tell me how Gary ALWAYS RETIRING Russell Jr. is BETTER than Sugar Shane Mosley??? Or 14 loss Salido is better than Oscar???

Casual fans are a JOKE!!! And you are CASUAL 101 x 1000%.

Wow you are salty little boy.
My point was that there's nothing that suggests that Mayweather would have STOPPED Lomachenko, not about if he could have beaten Lomachenko, I'm talking about stopping him.
But i understand when I'm talking to someone that doesn't have reading comprehension.

[Shadoww702]

Wow you are salty little boy.
My point was that there's nothing that suggests that Mayweather would have STOPPED Lomachenko, not about if he could have beaten Lomachenko, I'm talking about stopping him.
But i understand when I'm talking to someone that doesn't have reading comprehension.

Ever here of a dude named Lorenzo Aragon causal fan??? Your too fkn ****** to probably even know who he was... He was Loma before Loma was even thought of....Floyd didn't stop him but he was like the 1st American to beat a Cuban in like 20+ years!!!

[Shadoww702]

Wow you are salty little boy.
My point was that there's nothing that suggests that Mayweather would have STOPPED Lomachenko, not about if he could have beaten Lomachenko, I'm talking about stopping him.
But i understand when I'm talking to someone that doesn't have reading comprehension.

Hey can you please show many ANY website that doesn't have your GOD Lomachenko with a loss??? I went to ESPN, Boxingrec, BS, Ring??? They ALL show him with a LOSS???

[Shadoww702]

Wow you are salty little boy.
My point was that there's nothing that suggests that Mayweather would have STOPPED Lomachenko, not about if he could have beaten Lomachenko, I'm talking about stopping him.
But i understand when I'm talking to someone that doesn't have reading comprehension.

I also don't give 2 shts what you think. You don't count LOSSES! In your tiny lil mind Loma is 100-0. And NEVER LOST to Salido!

[hitking]

Right, because Mayweather was known for his unbelievable punching power.

Obviously, you haven't been following boxing long. Because Floyd had very good punching power at 130. Hit a helluva lot harder than Lomachenko. That's for sure.

[Verus]

Lets just PUT Lomachenko in the BOXING HOFAME right NOW!!!!

He BEAT BAD @ss 25-1 underdog Jason Sosa!!!!

HOF, now that is thought! Lomachenco has won 2 world championships in his first 7 fights and his skills are astonishing and all that, but HOF is a bit premature. I have 2 names for you: Harry Agganis in Baseball and Ernie Davis in Football. The Golden Greek Agganis was a once in a lifetime athlete and Ernie Davis was generally acknowledged as having greater potential than even the legendary Jim Brown. Their skills were a thing of beauty, and they both would no doubt be in the hall of fame, but both died in their early 20's. I know you meant your comment as sarcasm. Halls of fame are meant for a body of work over a career, but we sure can admire their skills at any stage of their career, even if they never make the HOF.

[yngwie]

Ever here of a dude named Lorenzo Aragon causal fan??? Your too fkn ****** to probably even know who he was... He was Loma before Loma was even thought of....Floyd didn't stop him but he was like the 1st American to beat a Cuban in like 20+ years!!!

Yes, i know who Aragon was and i know him better than you since Floyd was the first usa boxer that beat a Cuban IN THE OLYMPICS in 20 years, Aragon wasn't better than Lomachenko as an amateur, he never had the same resume, never won an Olympic gold and didn't win the Val Barker either, again, what has Aragon to do with my post?, nothing.
It must be sad to don't know how to read a sentence properly.

[yngwie]

Hey can you please show many ANY website that doesn't have your GOD Lomachenko with a loss??? I went to ESPN, Boxingrec, BS, Ring??? They ALL show him with a LOSS???

Again boy, tell me when I said that Floyd couldn't beat him, i said that nothing suggested that he could have stopped him.
But i understand that people like you usually are a little slower to comprehend sentences, so that's why you are replying me in three different posts.
So let's do something, go and take a few hours to analyze my posts and then answer just my ARGUMENTS.
But in just one post please, i know it sounds hard, but I'm nice with the slower guys so I'm giving you a pass this time.

[Shadoww702]

Yes, i know who Aragon was and i know him better than you since Floyd was the first usa boxer that beat a Cuban IN THE OLYMPICS in 20 years, Aragon wasn't better than Lomachenko as an amateur, he never had the same resume, never won an Olympic gold and didn't win the Val Barker either, again, what has Aragon to do with my post?, nothing.
It must be sad to don't know how to read a sentence properly.

He also would of not had a loss to Salido...

[yngwie]

Obviously, you haven't been following boxing long. Because Floyd had very good punching power at 130. Hit a helluva lot harder than Lomachenko. That's for sure.

I agree he hit harder than Lomachenko at that weight, but nothing suggested he could have stopped him.
Mayweather never was a one punch ko artist and Lomachenko has never shown fragility to suggest that he couldn't have taken him to the distance.