Comments Thread For: Vasyl Lomachenko Punishes and Stops Jason Sosa
Collapse
-
-
You don't have to be a one punch KO artist to stop guys. Floyd had above average power at 130. He also would probably be able to do a couple things that Lomachenko hasn't encountered much in his life. And that's hit Loma with more than a single punch at a time. And hit Loma with shots he may not see coming.Comment
-
-I don't think that Lomachenko is p4p number 1.A)In his second fight against a world champion with a weight disadvantage and lots of fouls?. - Is this not an EXCUSE??
B) You act like Russel Jr. is Jesus Christ. You said earlier that that win counted as much as any Floyd did.
Now my TURN??? Why does beating a punching bag named Sammy Sosa make you a P4P #1 even though you have a LOSS???
-My point about the Salido fight count as an excuse maybe, but it doesn't means that i said he didn't win.
-I never said that the Russell win was better than any of the Floyd wins, but you can show me the post where i said it if you want.
I'm used to be right and I'm used to talk to people that are a little slower to comprehend sentences, but you are taking it a little too far kid.Comment
-
Well you are sure that Lomachenko would have been stopped by Floyd and I'm sure he won't considering that Floyd never stopped a fighter on the level of Lomachenko, so were are not going to agree at any point.You don't have to be a one punch KO artist to stop guys. Floyd had above average power at 130. He also would probably be able to do a couple things that Lomachenko hasn't encountered much in his life. And that's hit Loma with more than a single punch at a time. And hit Loma with shots he may not see coming.Comment
-
If Mikey did beat him, I am willing to bet it would look almost identical to Gamboa vs Crawford. Gamboa had the speed and skill but couldn't deal with Crawford's size. That said, that would be an epic fight!Comment
-
Lomachenko's level??? I would say Genaro Hernandez and Chico Corrales are historically better than Lomachenko at this point in his career.Comment
-
I disagree with the majority opinion that size was the determining factor in Crawford-Gamboa. Gamboa does a lot of dumb **** in the ring and Crawford was not only had the skill, he also had the physical gifts to take advantage of the numerous technical errors Gamboa makes. That fight kinda reminded me of Barrera-Hamed. Crawford's size may have allowed him to stop Gamboa where Barrera wasn't able to stop Named. But even if you took away the size advantage, it was a technical mismatch.Comment
-
There a lot of questions marks about Lomachenko, but again , there's nothing that suggests that Floyd would have stopped him.
Historically Corrales and Hernandez have better resume, but after how many fights and styles?, and still, neither of them fought like Lomachenko, i have seen the flaws of Lomachenko , but his durability has never been cuestionable or at least not yet.Comment
-
I agree somewhat but it sure helps a lot when your used to getting your jaw cracked by much bigger guys...
And that is why I give Loma 0 sympathy on his 2.5 lbs overweight excuse. You and I know since boxing began that EVERYONE at 1 time or another fought much bigger men. And WON!Comment
-
What does "fights like Lomachenko" mean? He had a unique style. But everybody looks amazing when there's no resistance in front of them. I'll use Floyd and Manny as an example. When Floyd has an overmatched for in front of him. The likely outcome is gonna be Floyd winning a 9-3/10-2 decision with Floyd doing just enough to win every round. The commentary after the fight will be more what the for didn't do, and not what Floyd did do. Manny on the other hand. When he has an overmatched for in front of him. Manny is gonna destroy him. He may blow them out in a couple rounds. If he doesn't, he's gonna bludgeon them into submission. Both will have had equally easy nights. But Manny's style will have made him look more impressive. Lomachenko has had true resistance in front of him one time. And he looked nothing like he's looked in his more impressive outings.There a lot of questions marks about Lomachenko, but again , there's nothing that suggests that Floyd would have stopped him.
Historically Corrales and Hernandez have better resume, but after how many fights and styles?, and still, neither of them fought like Lomachenko, i have seen the flaws of Lomachenko , but his durability has never been cuestionable or at least not yet.Comment
Comment