Examples of "all time greats" exposed worse than GGG

[kafkod]

yes you do when it fits your agenda..point is Ward fought a much better fighter

I don't have any agenda. I'm just a boxing fan who speaks out against agenda driven bullshit posted by fake fans like you.

[////]

"Exposed" is another of those boxing terms overused to the point of meaninglessness

A guy will outland his opponent 700-50 and people will say he was "exposed" because one of those 50 punches made for a good gif

[Larry the boss]

I don't have any agenda. I'm just a boxing fan who speaks out against agenda driven bullshit posted by fake fans like you.

Kov alev or Jacobs..whos better?

[Elroy The Great]

Bernard Hopkins - Drawed with segundo mercado in his prime a journeyman and then lost to taylor twice.

Roy Jones- at ggg's age was getting koed left and right.

Hagler - lost to monroe, watts, draws with Vito Antuofermo.

Trinidad - gets dropped numerous times in his career. Dropped by inexperienced david reid. Dropped by yury boy. Dropped by other c level fighters.

Monzoon - had draws and losses with journey man from brazil and argentina.

James toney- draw with sanderline williams a journey man. Lost twice to a guy 5 inches shorter in montell griffin.

There are too many more examples to name with other fighters.

Why are the standards so high with ggg? Even at 35 he's never getting dropped or taking punishment in any of his fights. He wins a clear decision against the number 2 guy but he's exposed and a hype job? Is it because he's from khazakstan and not american bred?

you can thank his ravenous fans who says hes the best the sport has ever had. he finally fought a live body and eked out a win.

[Scipio2009]

You are naming accomplishments of those fighters yet ignoring the fact they struggled or lost with opposition worse than jacobs but they get a pass. GGG dosen't.

They loss fights while they were learning their crafts (Trinidad simply bit off too much weight); no one is ignoring losses.

Golovkin is 35 years old, a ten-year pro, a decorated amateur, and he barely edged Daniel Jacobs, a good fighter but not a fighter that anyone has anywhere near the top fighters p4p (BoxRec had Daniel Jacobs rated #30 p4p).

After losing club fights as he was learning, Carlos Monzon defended the world middleweight title 15 friggin times.

why do you refuse to see the difference in the situations?

[bigjavi973]

Stephen Breadman Edwards said that. Look him up on Boxrec.

ik who breadman is but I dont care what he wrote.

you dont need to check those fights out on boxrec cuz BOTH OF THEM are on youtube.


go score them yourself if you'd like.


that was pretty much my point.

[NaijaD]

I don't have any agenda. I'm just a boxing fan who speaks out against agenda driven bullshit posted by fake fans like you.

No you speak out against the nonsense when it concerns a fighter you like, however you post tons of crap about fighters that you don't like. On what planet does that equate to not having an agenda? ..... definitely not the one we live on right now.

[kafkod]

No you speak out against the nonsense when it concerns a fighter you like, however you post tons of crap about fighters that you don't like. On what planet does that equate to not having an agenda? ..... definitely not the one we live on right now.

The only fighter I post regular criticism of is Canelo. I have no agenda against red haired or Mexican fighters. I just hate diva bull**** and the way he and Oscar are trying to manipulate public opinion after the most blatent duck ever seen in boxing history.

I also sometimes post crap about other fighters, usually Andre Ward, to illustrate to the GGG hate trolls how easy it is to turn their constant, moronic attacks on Golovkin against them, if you are prepared to be as ****** and/or biased about a situation as they are.

[PRINCEKOOL]

Danny Jacobs did not expose anything, he never once hurt Golovkin! or even backed him up! we all know Golovkin is prone to being slightly confused by movement and fast combinations so? there was nothing new exposed by Danny Jacobs! I still think it will be a very tall order for any 160 pound fighter to beat Golovkin, because his bruit strength and punch resistance just seems too impregnable at this specific weight....

[kafkod]

Danny Jacobs did not expose anything, he never once hurt Golovkin! or even backed him up! we all know Golovkin is prone to being slightly confused by movement and fast combinations so? there was nothing new exposed by Danny Jacobs! I still think it will be a very tall order for any 160 pound fighter to beat Golovkin, because his bruit strength and punch resistance just seems too impregnable at this specific weight....

No matter how hard a fighter can ****, or how many KO's he has to his credit, sooner or later he will come against an opponent who takes what he dishes out and fires back.

The big question is .. what happens then? Is there a "plan B"? Will a big puncher who is used to stopping everybody as soon as he conects be prepared and willing to dig deep and fight hard to the final bell, if necessary.

Danny Jacobs asked those questions of Golovkin and GGG answered them! Nobody got exposed. It was a tough, even, world championship fight, and the champ went down into the trenches and retained his titles. End of story.