Comments Thread For: Canelo: Jacobs Beat Golovkin By Two or Three Points!

[kushking]

Ever since gstring got schooled & made a press conference to announce hes ducking big bad "weight bully" jacobs for life like a COWARD. His gggroupies have been in full blown militant damage control mode. Keep trying to convince everyone were blind maybe well BELIEVE the way you lie to yourself into believing in the beiber of boxing.
At least beiber dont act like everyones ducking his paper belt holding azz,then turn around & use every excuse to duck real competition.

[Kigali]

Ever since gstring got schooled & made a press conference to announce hes ducking big bad "weight bully" jacobs for life like a COWARD. His gggroupies have been in full blown militant damage control mode. Keep trying to convince everyone were blind maybe well BELIEVE the way you lie to yourself into believing in the beiber of boxing.

Leave Gigi and his ****sexual fanbase alone.

[icha]

If that's Canelo's point of view, then Canelo himself lost to both Trout and Lara, and even to Cotto. He won those fights because the judges saw him connect the more MEANINGFUL and damaging punches, exactly the same point of view that would validate GGG defeating Jacobs (plus GGG was the aggressor the whole fight vs. a much bigger, younger and faster opponent).

He is hanging himself with a rope by commenting this. GGG being given the win, is equal to Canelo's victory over the three mentioned fighters.

Honestly I think any of the two, GGG or Jacobs, would beat Canelo at 160. GGG would beat him up real bad, while Jacobs would outbox and outpoint him.

canelo like many others values power punches over jabs, he outlanded both lara and trout on that department by far, jacobs outlanded ggg in that department in 8 rounds, not saying is the right way to score but thats why he had jacobs winning...
i had ggg up by 1 point by the way, too many close rounds..

[Dean_Razorback]

what about your fight with lara? i think that fight was a lot closer than GGG-Jacobs.

[ruedboy]

True, judges gave FM the fight by decision but how can Floyd fans be happy when their guy fights in a timid, defensive way in his legacy fight? In the biggest fight of his career, you'd think Floyd would want to make a statement.
Floyd won and Manny lost but sometimes winning's not the only thing.

[Metho_4u]

Leave Gigi and his ****sexual fanbase alone.

I really did lol @ this....Triple gay

[kushking]

canelo like many others values power punches over jabs, he outlanded both lara and trout on that department by far, jacobs outlanded ggg in that department in 8 rounds, not saying is the right way to score but thats why he had jacobs winning...
i had ggg up by 1 point by the way, too many close rounds..

He was outlanded in power shots in 8 rds & total power shots,yet these fanbois want to act like lara did anything but run like a scared ***** just like g who jabbed BECAUSE he was scared of getting kod by trading w jacobs like lara vs canelo.

[reneg_2]

If that's Canelo's point of view, then Canelo himself lost to both Trout and Lara, and even to Cotto. He won those fights because the judges saw him connect the more MEANINGFUL and damaging punches, exactly the same point of view that would validate GGG defeating Jacobs (plus GGG was the aggressor the whole fight vs. a much bigger, younger and faster opponent).

He is hanging himself with a rope by commenting this. GGG being given the win, is equal to Canelo's victory over the three mentioned fighters.

Honestly I think any of the two, GGG or Jacobs, would beat Canelo at 160. GGG would beat him up real bad, while Jacobs would outbox and outpoint him.

LMAO! You obviously are one biased guy. You hate Canelo that much? HAHAHAHA!
Lara is the only debatable fight. He beat Trout and Cotto CLEARLY. FOH. Learn some boxing then come back to this site.

Jacobs beat GGG, but a draw wouldve been fine. GGG did NOT win and he looked lost in there. He only knows how to attack. The blueprint is there.

[kushking]

On the real tip these fighters would probably all beat g@160: Lara, trout,charlo,jacobs(already did),canelo. @ 168:ward,50 yo bhop,degale,jack, Ramirez.

Gigi could've fought any of those fighters instead of Brook in a much bigger fight but knew hed have a good chance @ losing so he decided to keep going in his queef paper belt quest knowing hed make more money then cash out vs canelo, it is as obvious as can be that he held this last press conference to deflect off himself & back to canelo as always. He held a press conference ffs to say hes ducking jacobs & charlo for life & is going to fight bjs in nobodygivesa***astan so if he manages to ***up & lose (again) hell be gifted the belt by homejudges.Funny when gggroupies used to say martin murry was elite because he supposedly was robbed in an outdoor nightfight in the rain vs an aging martinez w knee injury, they claimed he was robbed because it was in Argentina,yet now they dont think its gs insurance policy in case he ****s up his only(retirement) payday by losing to saunders.

[Bda31175]

Then go fight Jacobs tough guy.